spiritually?
fornication - engaging in the pleasure that comes from spreading your 'seed' around with the ones you like the look of, and when your 'drunk' just about anyone - not particularly concerned about marriage or the result of the union.
i suppose it includes spilling your seed without impregnating, as long as you got to use the person.
After repeated "NO"s truly from the heart, yeah, I'd consider that it's an attempted rape.
I was thinking that their method of not helping the needy, not really loving, is THE sign that they are only fornicating - caring only superficially, and sometimes just about how they themselves are thought of.
It's becoming clearer.
There are those who love and have honourable intentions, and those who came to have sex.
Bang
Edited by - Bang on 5 July 2002 18:41:38
spiritually?
fornication - engaging in the pleasure that comes from spreading your 'seed' around with the ones you like the look of, and when your 'drunk' just about anyone - not particularly concerned about marriage or the result of the union.
i suppose it includes spilling your seed without impregnating, as long as you got to use the person.
Just a picture test.
spiritually?
fornication - engaging in the pleasure that comes from spreading your 'seed' around with the ones you like the look of, and when your 'drunk' just about anyone - not particularly concerned about marriage or the result of the union.
i suppose it includes spilling your seed without impregnating, as long as you got to use the person.
Spiritually?
Fornication - engaging in the pleasure that comes from spreading your 'seed' around with the ones you like the look of, and when your 'drunk' just about anyone - not particularly concerned about marriage or the result of the union. I suppose it includes spilling your seed without impregnating, as long as you got to use the person.
The door to door thing rings a bell.
Marriage is fostered in unconditional love - and the fruit is in God's hands.
Bang
Edited by - Bang on 5 July 2002 6:8:37
it's interesting that the society uses the "two witness" rule, the apostle paul interprets this differently in 2 corinthians 13:1. he says
"this will be the third time i am coming to you.
"by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established.".
Fuuuck, did they change that too?
Bang
professor: since you stated in another thread that your dad sees himself as a "mini-god", it got me wondering.
does jehovah, if he actually exists, views the gb/the elders and other religious leaders along with jesus as "mini-me"s, as in the "austin powers" characters?.
the dustrabbitedited by - dustrabbit on 4 july 2002 7:47:42.
what gave it away?
Is that a serious question?
Bang
this is my first 4th of july as a non jw.
so my question is what about patriotism?.
as much as i believe that most of what the jw believes is in error.
Larc,
If the entire world were JWs there would be no wars, since they are pacifists.
No, they're not. They look to the death of the 'enemy' with a glee; scapegoaters. Even "Herod and Pilate became friends that day."
They should have realised that evil is right at home in 'houses' that are "swept and tidy".
Bang
Edited by - Bang on 4 July 2002 8:57:17
that is the title of one of the current topics at watchtower.org.
while the slave trade may not have been condoned by god, article doesn't really answer the question as to why god did not condemn slavery outright.
it seems to me that the bible takes a neutral stand towards slavery, accepting it as a social fact.
God tolerates rapists and murders. Hey, He even tolerates jws. He just very tolerative.
Bang
Edited by - Bang on 4 July 2002 9:11:22
women sue jehovah's witnesses.
the associated press, .
no one answered the phone tuesday at the church in , about 60 miles northwest of the twin cities.
What's the fifty thousand crap about? Is the lawyer a jw or something?
Bang
professor: since you stated in another thread that your dad sees himself as a "mini-god", it got me wondering.
does jehovah, if he actually exists, views the gb/the elders and other religious leaders along with jesus as "mini-me"s, as in the "austin powers" characters?.
the dustrabbitedited by - dustrabbit on 4 july 2002 7:47:42.
That's a very disturbing view of God. I take it you used to be jw.
Bang
i found this by chance and wonder if you were aware of this.
i find the last two sentences rather funny:.
*** w64 6/1 352 questions from readers ***.
Before the serpent went and told lies so as to change other humans (and in a way envious of), the serpent still had a leg to stand on - but not anymore.
Bang
Now, his spiritual ideas (food) come from beneath and around him, not from above, and the serpent bites at those above who have their feet in the dirt (only need wash your feet), but they can crush the serpent with their heel. Even so, they aren't cruel, so there are still serpents.
Edited by - Bang on 3 July 2002 18:31:42
