If one concentrates on Mark and to some extent Matthew and Luke then one can make a good argument for an adoptionist Christology (subordinationism too). If one concentrates on the Johannine writings and some of Paul's then one can strongly argue for the full deity of Christ. There were different views of who Christ was by different communities of christians. The trinity was a decent attempt of the fourth century church to resolve this, but entirely ignored some other views like those of some docetic gnostics. People reading the different works can still perceive bits of those different views even though there were attempts to make the works "orthodox". I say the differences make for interesting discussion.
As it was in the beginning (apparently), is now, and (maybe) ever shall be.