My remote has automotive reflective pinstriping on both sides,it won't glow in the complete darkness but will light up like a cat's eye in a darkened room with a flashlight.
I actually used to find it once so far.
DannyHaszard
JoinedPosts by DannyHaszard
-
5
Remote Control for TV
by averyniceguy ini am trying to find something that will help me not to lose my remote control again.
i would like to find some kind of string that can be attached with the remote control from the recliner.
.
-
-
-
27
Article - Does the Witness stance on WAR prove they are the true religion?
by jwfacts inmany jws believe they are the only religion that doesn't go to war and hence the only true religion.
i am working on an article at http://jwfacts.com/index_files/war.htm to show that this is not valid reasoning, and would love any comments.
despite being neutral in war, jehovah's witnesses are not pacifists.
-
-
DannyHaszard
For the record it is true that Jehovah's Witnesses will not fight for their country and they didn't fight 'against' Hitler either.They were interned in Nazi concentration camps that were then liberated by young allied men/women who died to set them free. Note:JW's didn't support the Allies either and despise the same governments that protect their freedoms.
-
5
Ex-RLDS 'lost boys' sue over shunning/expulsion...hmmm
by alamb inhttp://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/lost-boy-sues-utah-polygamist-leader/20070221161309990001?cid=2359
-
-
-
34
Independent Thinking
by Jeffro ini decided to do a search of the watchtower library cd on the phrase 'independent thinking'.
only three times is it ever spoken of as being a good thing.
and those three instances are quite telling about the insidiousness of all of the other times that jw publications consider independent thinking to be such a bad thing.. .
-
-
DannyHaszard
Maybe you could explain how that is relevant to the topic?
Independent thinking cuts both ways the Watchtower wants theirs but is not willing to extend to their own dissenters who have independent thinking
Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.”
“Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.” -
34
Independent Thinking
by Jeffro ini decided to do a search of the watchtower library cd on the phrase 'independent thinking'.
only three times is it ever spoken of as being a good thing.
and those three instances are quite telling about the insidiousness of all of the other times that jw publications consider independent thinking to be such a bad thing.. .
-
-
DannyHaszard
quote from supreme court decision that favored JW's High rank article Religious minorities benefited from case
Reading Eagle, PA - 22 minutes ago
In the fall of 1935, Lillian Gobitas, 12, and her brother William, 10, Jehovah's Witnesses who lived in Minersville, refused on religious grounds to salute Wrote Justice Robert Jackson for the majority on Flag Day 1943: “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what is orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. ... “Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.” “Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.” Contact columnist John W. Smith at 610-371-5007 or [email protected] [email protected]letters to editor MAKE SURE WE WRITE THEM ON THIS HYPOCRISY -
16
BLUE GLOW IN THE LIVING ROOM
by Outaservice inyear ago when tv was becoming popular in every american home, the watchtower society appeared to be discouraging it for the 'rank & file' in the kingdom hall i attended, it was often spoken of as 'the devil's eyeball'!
our congregation servant once lamented that when he would drive by different brothers houses at night he could see the 'blue glow' through their windows, but they were not there for the meetings and service the next day!
of course, eventually they had to give up the fact that the brothers were not going to give up watching or owning televisions!
-
-
DannyHaszard
Harmful X-ray emmisions from the high voltage 'cage' the capacitor in the old 300 watt B+W vacume tube TV was used to create anti-TV Watchower propaganda.
Anybody remember that one?
-
22
JW's ruin your sex life?
by NYerGirl inafter a year or so of being a "lurker" (since i know some of you despise that word, say, instead, window shopper?
), i finally signed up.
for the last week or so, i've come to the sight every day and i've learned a lot and also remembered more than maybe i wanted to.. so here's my issue: i've been married for 1 1/2 years, together with this man for 5+ years.
-
-
DannyHaszard
JW's ruin your sex life?
My repressed sex life in the Jehovah's Witnesses True story,I couldn't have made this up
-
21
You would stop criticising the JWs if they do what?
by greendawn inoccasionally we get accused of being too harsh and venomous with the jws and the wts that directs them in all things.
so to give a measure of how justified we feel in criticising them we could ask the question: .
what things do the dubs have to stop doing or believing for you to stop criticising them?
-
-
DannyHaszard
Be more like Mormons and not only actively encourage education but have your own university (Brigham Young)
Good point as well as health clinics like SDA or food pantries & soup kitchens.
-
185
WT BLOOD GUILT EXPOSED TO THE WORLD
by DannyHaszard inparents don't get a moral pass.
toronto star, canada - 3. even the discovery that their parents were devout jehovah's witnesses and is there any other kind of watchtower congregant?
raised only faint alarm ... rosie [email protected] the author.
-
-
DannyHaszard
Comment box at link add yours Babies seized after Jehovah’s Witness mother refuses blood for ...
Times Online, UK - 1 hour ago
Beyond evangelising, Jehovah’s Witnesses are commonly known for one other thing: their fervent opposition to blood transfusions . ... From The Times February 23, 2007Babies seized after Jehovah’s Witness mother refuses blood for sextuplets
Catherine Philp The birth of Canada’s first sextuplets should have been cause for celebration. But their struggle for life has provoked a ferocious battle pitching Church against State and a child’s right to life against parents’ rights to practise their faith. When the four boys and two girls were born nearly three months prematurely in early January, they were hailed as a miracle. The mother, on being told that she was carrying multiple foetuses, had been offered “selective reduction”, a procedure to remove several foetuses to help to ensure the survival of the others. She refused. At birth, the babies weighed less than two pounds (1kg) each, and measured less than an outstretched adult hand. They were put into incubators but within a week two had died. Doctors told the parents that the surviving infants desperately needed blood transfusions if they were to survive, but once again the parents refused. The babies’ parents, still unnamed, it now emerged, were Jehovah’s Witnesses. Beyond evangelising, Jehovah’s Witnesses are commonly known for one other thing: their fervent opposition to blood transfusions. In their faith, it is nothing less than akin to rape. The belief is based on the Witnesses’ interpretation of several verses in Genesis, Leviticus and Acts that forbid Christians from ingesting blood. Unable to persuade the parents to allow the procedure, the hospital in Vancouver applied to the British Columbia government to take the surviving babies into protective custody so that the transfusions could be administered. The authorities complied and custody of the three most sickly infants was transferred to the state. The parents, while grieving over the loss of two of their children, were livid with the authorities for removing what they saw as their parental rights. They applied for a court order to return the babies to their care. But in the meantime two of the babies in custody were given transfusions — to save their lives, their doctors say. In his affidavit to the court, the children’s father argued that their rights had been trampled on and demanded that the children be returned to their care. He added that he and his wife had been forced to leave the hospital while the transfusions were taking place, unable to bear seeing doctors “violating our little girl”. But, as their lawyer showed up to appeal against the custody order, the court suddenly reversed its decision and handed the babies back. That was three weeks ago but still almost nothing more is known about the babies’ condition other than that they are “progressing”. The parents may again have custody but they are now preparing to take the provincial government to court over their failure to let them put evidence to a court before allowing the transfusions to proceed. Yesterday the supreme court of British Columbia postponed the hearing until April so that lawyers could study a weight of documentary evidence. Legal experts expect the government to argue that the babies’ lives were in immediate danger and they had no option but to act immediately. The case has shocked largely secular Canada, a country not famed for religious extremism. Representatives of the Jehovah’s Witnesses have urged the public and media not to make “stereotypical assumptions” about their faith based on the case. Canada’s constitution enshrines the right to freedom of religion. But prominent ethicists argue that this cannot apply to children too young to hold beliefs, never mind to express them. “While the parents are at liberty to make martyrs of themselves, their children are not,” Eike-Henner Kluge, a bioethi-cist at the University of Victoria told the Globe and Mail. The hearing in April will decide on the legal matter of whether the parents were denied their moment in court and not on their religious rights. Whatever the outcome, the life-saving transfusions cannot now be reversed. The biblical line ‘And any man from the house of Israel, or from the aliens who sojourn among them, who eats any blood, I will set My face against that person who eats blood, and will cut him off from among his people’ Leviticus 17:10 Comment box at link add yours -
21
You would stop criticising the JWs if they do what?
by greendawn inoccasionally we get accused of being too harsh and venomous with the jws and the wts that directs them in all things.
so to give a measure of how justified we feel in criticising them we could ask the question: .
what things do the dubs have to stop doing or believing for you to stop criticising them?
-
-
DannyHaszard
What could the Watchtower leadership do to 'almost overnight' improve it's image and become a more benign religion? (1) Repeal their draconian shunning protocol of dissident members (suggested by Gary B.) (2) Stop ineffective door to door cold call intrusion to recruit members,I have found this the be the #1 complaint among the general population (3) Get rid of the embarassing blood transfusion thingy By the way...U want Danny to go away?
------- No rest for the wicked watchtower-Danny Haszard Bangor Maine edit--What forensic psychologist say about cult leaders like Jim Jones and David Koresh.They are control freaks who will never abdicate control.They will choose death by suicide or a fiery fight to the very end.We can indeed see a comparison with the arrogant watchtower cult.
Watchtower bosses go after the Rockland Massachusetts Kingdom Hall and Danny Haszard will do da stall... instead if ya cop-a-plea A-O-P... Danny will go on and gloat with glee.
Got 100,000 anti-Watchtower cult pages up in 5 years of Internet and I ain't gonna stop until ......
Dig it??