peacefulpete:
My research has led me to the opinion that Mark in it's final form could be that late. The min-apocalypse shows signs of being reworked/updated to include events of the 3rd war. Matt followed soon, Luke a decade or so later.
I’m not saying it’s impossible, but it is unnecessary and not entirely likely. Picking an event that seems similar about ‘false prophets’ and concluding that it ‘must’ be part of the ‘fulfilment’ (irrespective of whether it is asserted as ‘prophecy’) is falling into the same trap as people who say there are ‘false prophets’ fulfilling it now. In the same manner, if Mark were written when most scholars say it was, people in the 130s could have run around saying , “See, Mark has prophecy about what’s happening now,” but really it’s just more events that are ‘similar enough’ to some vague statements. Then through the years, there are more and more events that ‘fit’ (due to ambiguity), and you get to where we are now.