Este:
I don't post on my own I am compelled to write so it is not me that is writing.......I just do as I am told. I don't need a way out for we are in the end without a doubt.
If you are hearing actual audible voices, it is very important that you seek medical attention.
14X42=588(b.c.e.) so it would make sense that a generation is 42 years
No. That is stupid. A 'generation' doesn't have any specific length, regardless of whatever arbitrary figure you arrive at for some specific individuals. Case in point, the 'generations' from David to the deportation average out to 30 years. Your theory is drivel.
Since when is it humorous to have people in need of being saved from destruction? Who do you think would destroy this planet GOD or man? Why man of course, as it has been proven. We now have war ships out at sea with nuclear capabilty preparing for war. What will be the outcome of that?
Sigh. I see you're attempting to give your views a veneer of realism by focusing on 'nuclear capability' rather than your actual position that '2016 is an arbitrary multiple of a number of years since the year alleged for an individual who almost certainly never actually existed'.
Let the one with intelligence calculate the number of the wild beast.......666
NUMEROLOGY:Multiply 666=216 (9 is constant)
Divide 666=1.1666 (1 is constant)(.1666 is constant)
911 Is The Number Of The Wild Beast
Estephan
I think you demonstrated by the 'numerology' above that you're not 'the one with intelligence'.
And in case it helps, '666' in Revelation was a reference to Nero.
god's real name and identity yhvh.
yhwh - fraudulent identity.. .
can we all sue wt for evidenced fraud and deliberate deception ??
*lost*
why do you have to keep pushing your anti christian rhetoric, we get it. you dont beleive there is a god, why do you have flog it to death. just leave it alone. your not helping by bashing bashin bashing all of the time
Your objection is a strawman.
Your claim that 'Jehovah' is 'really' 'the Devil' is wrong, quite independentally of whether either of them actually exist. Your position is based on flawed semantics, irrespective of whether God exists or not.
Este:
At least post something intelligent......
The intelligent readers will realise my post was humorous. The difference between my post and yours is that yours are humorous for all the wrong reasons.
Jomavrick:
The end of the world, the tooth fairy, unicorns, Big Foot, UFO's, leprichans, elves, clear aluminum, Hellfire, - they all get filed into the same hanging folder in my book.
No clear alumin[i]um huh? Really? Then how do you think they got the whales on to the Enterprise to save the future... wait... that may not have actually happened.
i realise now that all true christians that believe in christ and get baptized are anointed with holy spirit, making me one of the anointed.
i also believe the symbolic number of 144k are the first-fruits that will be pick by yehovah but no distinction until then (romans chapter 3).
so since there's a scripture in 1john i think that says the anointed will not need to be taught by others and will have understanding, i'm thinking of telling the elders 'do to the fact that i'm now anointed i no longer need to go to their meetings.
Crazyguy (probably not a good choice of usernames):
So since there's a scripture in 1John i think that says the anointed will not need to be taught by others and will have understanding, I'm thinking of telling the elders 'do to the fact that i'm now Anointed i no longer need to go to their meetings.
Won't work. You should know that, despite what they may claim, in 'JW-land' organisational policy trumps the Bible (which is subject to interpretation anyway). The 'elders' would cite articles in The Watchtower about the 'anointed' still needing 'spiritual food' from 'the slave'. If you disagree with them, they'll ultimately accuse you of 'apostasy', which will get you on the fast track to shunning.
If you want to fade, you probably shouldn't tell the elders anything. It's none of their business.
the term jehovah was the invention of a catholic monk (raymundus martini) in ad 1202, that name may not appear in scripture, because there existed not until the 12th century, so the jw can not say that appears 7,000 times in scripture, de hecho, in fact, this name is linked with that of demologia and illuminati,.
.
.
Jeffro you cannot deny that worldwide there are many different forms of worship/religions/beliefs/stuctures. they all originated somewhere. It would do more to talk about the ancient times of where and how these stories emerged and the knock on effect.
Of course. And I've already explained that Jehovah*/Yahweh/YHWH/YHVH/God/Allah (all different labels for the same deity of the 'Abrahamic' religions) was first 'invented' (more likely, borrowed and adapted from even earlier traditions) as a deity of Canaanite tribes and became popularised by the tribe(s) that became known as the Jews. This is in fact supported by those parts of what you have presented that can be called 'evidence', and is also the most reasonable conclusion.
*Your improper hyphenation as 'Je-hovah' is based on a corrupted fusion of Hebrew words that are not directly related.
But your claims that 'Satan' (a concept that didn't even figure in the minds of the early tribes who first made up 'Yahweh' because Satan (capital S) as an entity is a later invention) has 'tricked' people who worship 'YHVH' (or whatever you want to call it) into 'really' worshiping 'Satan' are entirely separate from actual historical development of the terms or the ways the terms are actually used, and is nothing but an equivocation fallacy.
If I like chocolate icecream, and someone calls 'chocolate' blargle, and then someone else says blargle is 'really' strawberry, it doesn't mean I 'really' like strawberry icecream instead of chocolate.
If someone believes in God (the 'true' god, the 'creator' as taught in the Abrahamic faiths), and that person calls 'God' Jehovah (or any of the other names for the same deity), and then you come along and say that name 'really' means Satan (based on incorrect etymological relationships plus a whole extra layer of speculation to reach the conclusion), it has absolutely no bearing on which deity the person is actually worshipping, no matter how many word games you play, and no matter whether the deity actually exists.
i was recently acquainted with the exhaustive - and blatantly inaccurate and crazy - theorizing by a "dr thomas", the "founder" of the christadelphians.. he was an earlier "contemporary" of chuck russell - and some have accused russell of "stealing" the christadelphians main teachings.
they're probably correct in their accusation.
christadelphians do not believe in the trinity or hellfire, are conscientious objectors who do not vote and who hate catholicism and are scathing in their views of christendom - although like all "decent" religious groups, jws included, have toned down their rabid attacks on other religious groups in recent decades.. dr thomas's quaint - and hilariously self-important - interpretation of scripture, led him on several occasions to predict the end of the world in his own day.
In the United States, and many other western countries, JWs are growing faster than the general population.
'Many' western countries' isn't actually accurate. In most western countries, there has been a decline in actual JW growth and a decrease in the proportion of JWs to the rest of the population.
The United States, as the home of both the JW religion and a long tradition of Bible-thumping (and opposition to atheism), is not really representative of the rest of the developed world.
the term jehovah was the invention of a catholic monk (raymundus martini) in ad 1202, that name may not appear in scripture, because there existed not until the 12th century, so the jw can not say that appears 7,000 times in scripture, de hecho, in fact, this name is linked with that of demologia and illuminati,.
.
.
Heaven:
This Yahweh/Jehovah entity sounds like a real dick to me. I can't fathom for the life of me why anyone would want to worship a god man of war.
Absolutely. This is why believers tend to 'cherry-pick' the 'nice' things that the Bible says about God, quietly ignoring the bits about genocide, bigotry, misogyny, racism, slavery, discrimination, etc...
