Again you are taking our definitions of the words and applying them to the activities of the anceients. The ancients on the other hand saw the two as connected and the same. We can review many of the greats like Copernicus, Galileo and others and they all did both. Astrology was considered science back then.
Your quotes about Copernicus and Tycho demonstrate the point I already made. As I've already stated, and as you've also said here, they - like the Babylonians - did both. That doesn't mean that both are the same thing. In any case, even if you like to consider them to have been the same thing, it remains that the elements that actually were of value were those parts related to astronomy, and not those aspects that were actually astrology.
We can see this in Job 32, where the author is using them hand in hand and interchangable.
Um... no.