I think you may be obsessing about it a bit too much. People who have never been Witnesses rarely care about such a thing.
I'm sorry, but Fe2O3Girl makes a valid point. The language you use hints at a serious degree of Witness-think still embedded. I could never consider Brigid a "potential mate". It dehumanizes a person.
IMO, while I wouldn't say stay completely off the market, you would do well to continue to work on divesting your psyche of the JW-think before looking seriously. You will find that something as simple as a change of linguistics will work wonders. IOW, look for clues in your own speech, writing and mannerisms that "mark" you and look to replacing them.
That all being said, should you choose to talk about your Witness past with a woman you're interested in, the more you dwell upon it, the more alarm bells will likely go off for her.
Admittedly, though, I loved the standard of high morals that
I applied in my life as a Jehovah's Witness and still adhere
to them. And, I would love to find someone with the same
nice qualities that I am used to.
(*Sigh, I should have been born in the 18th or 19th century).
LOL! Perhaps you should watch The Libertine to get an idea of what some were up to in the 17th century. Though I can understand the sentiment as I felt much the same way for many years, tending to romanticize the past.
The world's morals are loose and something I personally
despise. The thought of becoming wrapped up with a can-
didate from the Jerry Springer show mortifies me.
More JW-think. There is not such a thing as "the world's morals". Though... the thought of becoming involved with a Jerry Springer candidate would (should!) chill anyone to the bone.