I have assumed not but can't find anything saying you can't.
Anyone help?
Thanks
i have assumed not but can't find anything saying you can't.
.
anyone help?.
I have assumed not but can't find anything saying you can't.
Anyone help?
Thanks
i grew up catholic and i never knew any; still don't.
and i can't think of any catholic i know who personally knows any.
compare this to how many disfellowshipped jws you personally know..
I don't know any excommunicated Catholics. But then again I don't know any practising Catholics.
I don't want to either. How any decent, principled person with a sense of right and wrong could be part of that religion I don't know.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
It is the same problem with JW's. The religion, nearly every religion probably, supercedes what a person knows to be right.
Off topic I know, sorry.
has wt ever published a number of how many they expect to die at armageddon?.
will it bring the population down to the georgia guidestones advice for a manageable level?.
.
Take a look at this answer on wikianswers.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_do_Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_think_will_die_at_Armageddon
watchtower 15th march 1953 page 191.. ''there is no reason to think that they [demons] cannot possess persons today.. this is not to say that all those mentally sick are so possessed, for they are not.. mentally sick persons, however, in their weakened state, may present more vulnerable targets for their assaults and invasions.. some show evidence of demon possession, whereas others show evidences of merely mental sickness or nervous breakdown.
'' (emphasis mine).
i for one would not want to work with people with mental illness or depression just in case they were possessed by some of those pesky spirits.. .
Watchtower 15th March 1953 page 191.
''There is no reason to think that they [demons] cannot possess persons today.
This is not to say that ALL those mentally sick are so possessed, for they are not.
Mentally sick persons, however, in their weakened state, may present more vulnerable targets for their assaults and invasions.
SOME show evidence of demon possession, whereas others show evidences of merely mental sickness or nervous breakdown.'' (Emphasis mine)
I for one would not want to work with people with mental illness or depression just in case they were possessed by some of those pesky spirits.
join any church organization in his day?
no, god does not require us to do that; but he requires us to worship him''.
watchtower 1st march 1953 page 143 paragraph 12..
join any church organization in his day? No, God does not require us to do that; but he requires us to worship him''
Watchtower 1st March 1953 page 143 paragraph 12.
probably been answered before but does anyone know if transfusions of hemoglobin are allowed by the boys in charge?
.
thanks.
That's what I thought. I believe the 97% is dry content and it is 35% of total content including water (Wikipedia).
Do hospitals actually transfuse just hemoglobin or do they hook you up to a bag of red cells for ease?
What does a pint bag of hemoglobin look like compared to a pint bag of red cells or a pint bag of whole blood?
probably been answered before but does anyone know if transfusions of hemoglobin are allowed by the boys in charge?
.
thanks.
Probably been answered before but does anyone know if transfusions of hemoglobin are allowed by the boys in charge?
Thanks
i don't know if i, or smoeone else, shared this before but i thought it funny and odd enough to share again.
imagine if you will, if we actually presented what we all know to be true about the beliefs of the jw's at the door when we were witnesses.
after all, jesus message was to be simple; simple enough that even the poorest and most uneducated would be able to accept him and convert to christianity, no matter the flavor of kool-aid we were pushing.
Read it aloud, quickly and with an enthusiastic smile.
I couldn't stop laughing all the way through.
Brilliant. Thanks for sharing.
Reading the Branch letters of that era compared to now? The zeal has gone.
richard dawkins closes down his free-thinking/free-thought site (www.richarddawkins.net) for 30 days to reconfigure it 'because too many morons were contributing drivel' (he doesn't put it quite like that!
) he is then surprised because those self-same contributors call him everything under the sun (i won't repeat the names flung at him on our ultra -refined boards).
he now wants the site more or less 'peer-reviewed' (by analogy with papers to learned/scientific journals having to be vetted by vips).
I don't know. But he doesn't believe in any gods and wishes no one else did either. I agree with him.