I was rather disappointed by the article. It has a number of factual errors, some of which have been brought out, which will cause loyal dubs to doubt its credibility. It also starts off by referring to a whole lot of old discarded beliefs and portrays them as if they are still current beliefs held by JW's. (vaccinations, organ transplants, etc). JW's will merely dismiss it as sensationalism by a reporter with a personal grudge against them. And what sort of journalist cannot even get the official figures of JW membership correct.
The example of quotes from the site was weak too. Why didn't Bates put up something a little more dramatic, like a quote about selling homes and possession to go preaching before 1975 or something similar, or a quote about the 1914 generation not ending.
It also totally failed to capture the irony and hypocrisy of the fact that the Watchtower has fought for it's own freedom of speech in many international Courts yet here it has crushed a website that only contained official quotes from JW publications.