Jerome said:
Without question he has no experience in these areas; that is abundantly (ab unda: from the flood) clear for all who are experienced to see, and his tediously prolonged verbosity now rings hollow. He is seen to be the apologist that he insidiously is.
To which Duns responded:
I do not have all day to dispense with the sum total of mendacious and unjustified vilifications thrust at my faith today.
The multitudes of first person examples of abuse that have been posted on this board don’t warrant some degree of vilification? Are the perpetrators not villainous? You must be kidding. I then have to ask, what WOULD qualify them as such in your view?
And:
He now resorts to vague questions and trap queries in an attempt to put a true follower of Christ to the test.
Duns now resorts to exhibiting a persecution complex: the last bastion of the deluded, self-righteous, and hopelessly defeated.
Yes Duns, Jerome is right, you have no experience in these areas and you are arguing out of your depth. Why do that?
To Isis:
Welcome to the board, that thanks for speaking up. I can imagine how trying disputes like this are to someone who has suffered as you have.
As we seen played out over and over again in the political arena in these types of situations, the Society also will attempt to deny, deny, deny (thereby showing their complete indifference to the pain of their victims). . . until the facts are presented for all to see. For you, and others like you Isis, vindication of some sort is on the horizon. I say this because I too have had some recent involvement with the almost completed Dateline expose’, and I can tell you that this mess is far worse then I could have ever imagined. For certain, you are not alone.