Hello Mindchild,
I find your post very interesting. If one is into finding out the "truth" about a particular subject then it takes the type of hard work and research I've seen you demostrate in this and other post. Good work!
I am, however, puzzled about a statement you made in this recent post.
You said;
"All these plants and much more solid geological evidence shows no global flood happened in 2370 BC or anywhere near then."
You see, it struck me as odd that based on the plants you have described you are holding it up as a "proof" that a global flood did not happen, other "solid geological evidence" notwithstanding.
Now, personaly, I take the Bible account of a global flood as a matter of faith. And, admittantly, there may not be enough "evidence" that a global flood did not happen that could convince me otherwise.
With that said, such "evidence" needs to be, at the least, reasonable.
Even the faithful must conceed to the Copernicus and Galileo type of evidence, if the faithful are to remain faithful to the ideals of truth, no matter how unsettling.
What I like to know is; Did you use your plant research and try to think of how the Creosote bush COULD have servived a year long global flood?
I ask because of my admitted convictions but also because i realy DO believe the truth is of extreem importance,( which is why I'm such a terible lier )
My concerns were:
1) Could the bush have servived on a small flotilla of wood, dirt, and other plants for a year?
2) Could their have been more than one flotilla?
3) Could very productive years have accellerated the growth and very cold years retard the growth?
4) Could the plant have adappted from a wet enviornment to a dry one over thousandands of years?
5) Are you willing to BELIEVE that these possibilities might be accurate.
Now, I'm no botanist. I'm ignorant about a lot of things, that's why I ask a lot of "stupid" questions, which is what got me into trouble with the borg "elder" drones. I believe, however, that "truth" MUST withstand ANY scrutiny, if it is to remain "truth". This is why I'm questioning the info you have submitted. I do this with a desire to come to a more complete understanding of the subject provided.
I respect your conclusions and enjoy your post.
CornerStone