Apologies if a thread has been posted on this already but I didn't see anything. In view of the other articles in the magazine, about apostasy and shunning, what they have to say about the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia takes on a new light and shows the contradiction in their positions. Some choice quotes:
"The prosecutor said the government should ban Jehovah's Witnesses because they make people hate others and because they destroy families."
"Another doctor said in court that he had studied more than 100 Witnesses in Moscow. He said that these Witnesses were mentally healthy and that after becoming Jehovah's Witnesses, they had more respect for other religions than they had before." (So why would they shun a former Jehovah's Witness who decided to join one of those other religions?)
On the last page:
THE COURT'S JUDGEMENT
One accusation was that Jehovah's Witnesses destroy families. The judges decided that this was false. They said:
"It is the resistance and unwillingness of non-religious family members to accept and to respect their religious relative's freedom to manifest and practise his or her religion that is the source of conflict." - Paragraph 111.(It seems as if the court had been misled.)