The Society ignores that there is a maturational process in play and is blind to the fact that adults have the freedom to agree to the rules and beliefs of JWs when they become involved whereas children have no such freedom. An adult can decide whether to accept a Bible study, whether to start going to meetings, and whether they want to believe the full range of JW beliefs that one must agree to before baptism. A child first encounters the JW belief system as the unquestioned "truth" and cannot reflect on it from his or her own experience or knowledge base. Rather, he or she is discouraged from doing so by the so-called "mental regulating of Jehovah". It is thus inevitable that the "truth" is reassessed when the child's knowledge base expands and life experience increases. Some confirm their initial beliefs and remain as JWs but many discover that they no longer can share the JW beliefs as their own. Or a person's life experience has taught them that the organization is not the place they need to be. The maturing child is disadvantaged because they had an initial period of non-consensual involvement with the JWs, so the child would appear to be "rebelling" or "apostasizing" from their earlier footing when in reality they are in the same position (from a consensual point of view) as the worldly person who decides to discontinue a Bible study. The adult would simply continue being an ordinary worldly person, whereas the child would become something far worse -- a rebel against Jehovah. Without accommodating the natural maturation that children go through and without giving them the choice to decide for themselves whether the religion is right for them, the Society sets them all up for failure. At least the Amish understand this to some extent and give teens the opportunity to make their own decision (even experiencing the worldly lifestyle if they wish) before expecting them to commit to adult baptism.
Exactly how I feel, and much better worded!
There is no allowance for the "bloom of youth." And many times, youthful adherents without the benefit of a more balanced overview of life that comes with age, see things only in black and white. Their naivete motivates them to vigorously and courageously stand up for causes they feel are right.
I've thought also about a minimun age requirement for baptism. Hell will freeze before that happens I know. I've also thought I would use this arguement if anybody brings my baptism in for discussion. I figured I'd say, "I was twelve and had different questions and was pressured into baptism. Next!"