If the English translation of the court judgement by the German association JW Victim Help is accurate, there were ten items involved in the charge of defamation against Regina Spiess.
The court found the following statements were true and, therefore, not defamatory.
- That the plaintiff (Jehovah's Witnesses in Switzerland) operates a "practice of ostracism contrary to human rights" and does not grant their members freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
- "Saying something sweet, asking how the day was, or hugging the child [excluded from the community] - that is no longer possible. Children experience permanent fear."
The court found that the accused acted in good faith in believing the following statements to be true and so they were not defamatory.
2. "Most people simply do not know what a problematic community Jehovah's Witnesses are. They don't seem extreme to the outside world, at best a little old-fashioned. However, a broader awareness is gradually emerging of the serious forms of violence that people experience in such groups."
3. "InfoSekta [specialist unit for cult issues] judges Jehovah's Witnesses as a highly problematic group that tries to manipulate their members down to the level of existential identification. Community guidelines violate the physical, psychological and social integrity of their members."4. "In addition, Article 18 provides that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion - a right that the Watchtower Society claims but does not grant to its members."
The court found that whether the following statements were true or not, they were not defamatory.
- "Believers keep dying after traffic accidents or women giving birth."
- "There is hardly a Jehovah's Witness family without excluded family members: parents, siblings, or children with whom no contact is allowed."
- "Young people can hardly develop prospects in the Jehovah's Witness community: Often they cannot learn the profession that suits them because higher education is considered a waste of time...".
- "And they have only limited knowledge about the world, because secular friends are forbidden and they could not have many social experiences..."
It needs to be kept in mind that Jehovah's Witnesses in Switzerland were not on trial, they were the plaintiff. What the court determined was whether what was written about them was both defamatory and either true, or believed to be true by the journalist. While this was a victory for Regina Spiess and InfoSekta, I doubt it will have greater ramifications.