RAF

Joined

• started 17 topics
• posted 1,170 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by RAF

• 
  31

  SEX

  by billie jean in

  1. social
  2. relationships

  i don't mean to sound crude but ive always wondered what witnesses are allowed to do in their marriage (sex wise) only i always imagined that they wouldn't ever deviate from the 'missionary possition' and what about oral sex, is that allowed ?.

  i spoke to an 'on the fence' old friend of mine a while ago he'd recently married and he said that a sister in their congregation had told his wife that anything other than 'missionary' was totaly out, he was angry at this statement and told me he thought it was "a matter of conscience" .

  but i'm still curious !

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  Back to JWLAND nonsense,

  If the verse (don’t remember which one, maybe someone can put it here) they use to say oral sex is a NO NO (lost of seed LOL) well … it does not apply to women ... YEP !!! hummm

  But since they seems to care more about what a woman should do to be a good slave to her husband, they don’t bother making the difference. No for the man is no for woman too in this case … PFFFFFFFFFF.

  So at the end they come out with sex is for … Oh … but what is it for ? Not for fun ? … But there is a time for everything … NO ? But then I guess they can still say : not for what is due to God (seed – just like blood – since they can’t see what’s so material in there so called spiritual point of views). And What is "love" in all that (the joy to give some good time to the one you share also bad time with) … I ask NOT
• 
  51

  My Guarantee........................

  by Warlock in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i guarantee you, if everyone in the united states were allowed to carry a gun on their hip, people would treat each other with alot more respect.. warlock .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  I guarantee you, if everyone in the United States were allowed to carry a gun on their hip, people would treat each other with alot more respect.

  You would still have those who think and those who don't before to act, those who care, and those who don't (about whatever), bold and weak once (and bold doesn't mean armed from head to toes, at all) ... but more simply you have those who respect others (because it is their main principle) and those who don't (armed or not).

  What's in our hands doesn't change what's in our heads, but what's in our hands may talk about what's in our head according to what we do with it
• 
  35

  I cannot "unprove" every single wild-side 911 theory...

  by james_woods in

  1. social
  2. current

  here is what i received this morning from an enthusiast.... james-woods, do you remember leoleoia (wrong spelling) whom you supported vehemently on this subject?

  i've been waiting for her comments, and, still waiting.

  as for you, you've taken the course of least resistance, you decided to ignore me and not address the issue.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  Hi Bix Tex ... Je vais bien, merci et espère que vous également.

  To be clear : Also when I say the same way of collapsing, there are major differences about where thoses 3 buildings have been touched (wich level and how for the third one) and after how many times of injuries they collapsed (all 3) for them to have the very same reason to collapse the very same way (and more over from the very top to it bases in such little peaces). So from that if you only give me one explanation I feel like it misses something ...And when a bunch ofexperts dare to give there names to support theories which varies from those accepted by the Gov, (and even risk to lose their jobs, messing up their carreers and reputations) I think that they did really pay attention to what they are talking about, "based on facts" and what they know on the subject as experts in their areas.

  With such controversary (in between experts) I can only stick to what is less incoherent to me (from all sides).
• 
  35

  I cannot "unprove" every single wild-side 911 theory...

  by james_woods in

  1. social
  2. current

  here is what i received this morning from an enthusiast.... james-woods, do you remember leoleoia (wrong spelling) whom you supported vehemently on this subject?

  i've been waiting for her comments, and, still waiting.

  as for you, you've taken the course of least resistance, you decided to ignore me and not address the issue.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  Thousands of people watched planes filled with passengers fly into the twin towers. Have them refute that first. 9/11 conspiracy theorists have never been able to get around this basic fact.

  Also when I read something like this, I have to wonder ... what does it change really ??? Do the anti conspiracy theorists stick to that ? I hope not (what about production) Now about the precision : "thousand of people watched planes filed with passengers" is just impossible nobody saw that, a plane flies too high and to fast really !
• 
  35

  I cannot "unprove" every single wild-side 911 theory...

  by james_woods in

  1. social
  2. current

  here is what i received this morning from an enthusiast.... james-woods, do you remember leoleoia (wrong spelling) whom you supported vehemently on this subject?

  i've been waiting for her comments, and, still waiting.

  as for you, you've taken the course of least resistance, you decided to ignore me and not address the issue.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  But but but, the probleme is that even about "why" and "how" THOSE (not only 2) buildings collapsed the very same way has differents theories also supported by EXPERTS so who is right who is wrong ? They are all experts ... are we experts to say who is right or wrong ? NOPE so we stay with a personal opinion don't we ?
• 
  44

  How to Debate an Evolutionist (if you must)

  by hooberus in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this thread is primarily directed to biblical creationists and other non-evolutionists here (as such no or limited responses will be given to evolutionist posts here).

  please if you are a non-evolutionist attempt to refrain from debating evolutionists here on this thread, as they will likely try to derail any learning, or exposure of their tactics.

  i will try to avoid debating here but instead posting information in a series of posts.. i consider myself to be an informed biblical creationist and probably one of more experienced creation/evolution issue debaters to have been on this forum.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  How to Debate an Evolutionist (if you must)

  Agree to desagree ... cause how will you debate to prove creation ? ... O_O !!!
  (anyway evolution do not exclude the other theory ... So ...)
• 
  5

  OY ... Did we really read them ?

  by RAF in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  did we really read them ?

  (the quotes and the gb).

  colossian 1:15.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  hi Ty and Cameo D thanks for sharing your thoughts..

  I've introduced this thread with this question because ... after really debating (if I can tell debating with my sisters in fact against the GB arguments wich they really sticked to) Now when they read their bible and litterature they are the one who point out incoherences / non sense... it's funny somehow.

  And thought it would be cool to share them on this thread ...
• 
  6

  Was Law of Moses really necessary?

  by cameo-d in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  were people really so unfeeling and barbaric that they needed the behavioral laws of moses?.

  how do you think our civizalition would be today if we had never had those laws?.

  would people be better off to have been left to conscious and peer pressure to guide behavior?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  (A) yeah we don't need rules to love, we just need to be sentitive to others as much are we are for ourselves.

  so in the bible that's what I read

  • one that JW supports as you have to listening to rules (OBEY) without thinking about why and when it is a good thing ... that's what's the God of the OT (immature) is asking for (as demonstration of what doesn't work because of the obvious reality = A) even overprotection from God doesn't help people to be sensitive enough to others
  • Which leads to the one the one is in charge (Christ) wich is cancelling rules for only one principle to adhere to (love others as yourself as your god = Balance in everything)
• 
  35

  I cannot "unprove" every single wild-side 911 theory...

  by james_woods in

  1. social
  2. current

  here is what i received this morning from an enthusiast.... james-woods, do you remember leoleoia (wrong spelling) whom you supported vehemently on this subject?

  i've been waiting for her comments, and, still waiting.

  as for you, you've taken the course of least resistance, you decided to ignore me and not address the issue.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  There are enough experts to support both therories (cause there are at least 2 to 3 SOLID theories, the third being the 2 in one)

  1. conspiracy as an attack from saoudi arabians - against who nobody has retaliate ... O_O !!! - there was no alkaida before IT - but now there's alkaida everywhere O_O !!! and since it means against occidentals (somehow) it might be true now, morevore if most of arabians feels that you are againsts them all
  2. conspiracy as a strategy to support war for oil (and at the same time revange against Sadam for not being the american puppet - Not against OBL ! the famous Oussama)
  3. and even both conspiracies could have worked together (they know - but they help it to happened - in an even worst way )

  You want to support one of it in saying that experts says this, or no proof about that and that, you'll probably stay on your belief relatively to what matches your opinion ... And my opinion is that the course of events from before to after supports 2 or 3 ... voilà ... that's my opinion ... why ? Because there's no real arguments to support 1 (regarding to who the gov decided to retaliate against) and the GOD'VERNEMENT experts and puppets do not have any exclusivity in my attention.

  Then of course we can call whoever stupid to believe wathever, but what do any of us really sur of ? Time may tell ...
• 
  28

  ADAM HAD 8 PIGMENTION GENES IN HIS CELLS!

  by badboy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i understand that someone once asked why if adam was the first human,where all the different human skin colours come from, so the jw said that adam had 8 different pigmentions in his cells.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  RAF

  Who is adam exactly ? (sorry) ... Who can tell ?... but what can we see ?