ESTEE,
Closest thing I've ever heard from the platform was advice and direction (read orders) for those with disfellowshipped family members. I believe it was one of those 'special needs' talks that get rolled out of the archives whenever a congregation gets infected with independant thinking.
It went a lot like this: "Brothers, you may not find it easy to withdraw your contact, your association, your support, from a close family member. From someone you have deep affection for, from someone you love.
"But consider, brothers, your deeper concern in this matter. (Pregnant pause) Your concern for their everlasting salvation, for their spiritual well-being, indeed, concern for their everlasting life!
"How then will you show your love for these ones? Jehovah, the God of love, has provided the answer in His Scriptures..."
And then of course the speaker rolled out the whole treated as a tax collector, not even eating with such a one verses.
I know it's not exactly what you were looking for Estee, but what I recollect from that talk was a perfect example of something the JW's are expert at, the Orwellian double-think. Black-White.
I will show my great love for this person by withdrawing my love.
Or in the terms you expressed it, I can prove my unconditional love for this person by placing conditions upon it.
And thus do the JW's practice conditional love. By being taught that is nothing of the sort.
Eric