glenster
JoinedPosts by glenster
-
15
Hows 'bout some drums?
by glenster inthe rs list said ginger baker practically invented the rock drum solo.. i thought that seemed late.
sandy nelson--early '60's:.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/rolling-stone-readers-pick-best-drummers-of-all-time-20110208/7-stewart-copeland-0841006.
-
-
-
15
Hows 'bout some drums?
by glenster inthe rs list said ginger baker practically invented the rock drum solo.. i thought that seemed late.
sandy nelson--early '60's:.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/rolling-stone-readers-pick-best-drummers-of-all-time-20110208/7-stewart-copeland-0841006.
-
-
glenster
Any favorite drums will do. The RS list got me thinking about rock jazz/rock.
My Dad had swing tune/New Orleans jazz recordings at my house when I was little,
so I know there are lots of good drums parts there, too--some by Buddy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9esWG6A6g-k -
15
Hows 'bout some drums?
by glenster inthe rs list said ginger baker practically invented the rock drum solo.. i thought that seemed late.
sandy nelson--early '60's:.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/rolling-stone-readers-pick-best-drummers-of-all-time-20110208/7-stewart-copeland-0841006.
-
-
glenster
^ Thanks!
George Suranovich (with Love several albums after Forever Changes)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7ZGfEN2-kk -
10
FI-nally: "The In-Laws," 1979, Peter Falk, Alan Arkin
by glenster infeature: ovaltine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_suywoociy.
missing in the recent peter falk tribute:.
-
-
-
15
Hows 'bout some drums?
by glenster inthe rs list said ginger baker practically invented the rock drum solo.. i thought that seemed late.
sandy nelson--early '60's:.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/rolling-stone-readers-pick-best-drummers-of-all-time-20110208/7-stewart-copeland-0841006.
-
-
glenster
The RS list said Ginger Baker practically invented the rock drum solo.
I thought that seemed late. Sandy Nelson--early '60's:
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/rolling-stone-readers-pick-best-drummers-of-all-time-20110208/7-stewart-copeland-0841006
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2fNtUAPjC0
Ron Bushy plays Bart's tune
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rZYe1bbl3AMichael Shrieve
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is14oiI9JuoBuddy Rich 1970
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53cxGeeGFAUBilly Cobham (solo then song at 3:00)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aw2rM0w-pc -
16
Would Paul have debated theistic evolution, ID, etc... had he been alive today?
by Christ Alone ini submit that paul was arguing in the context of what people believe in those days.
i think that he would have debated, much like we do, atheism, evolution, scientific process, etc... just as we do today.. in paul's day, evolution was not even dreamed about.
i'm not using this as an argument against evolution or atheism.
-
-
glenster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-N2BbrfBSI
F.F. Powell argues that Paul, in his epistles, made use of many of the ideas of
the Greek philosopher Plato, sometimes even using the same metaphors and lan-
guage. For example, in Phaedrus, Plato has Socrates saying that the heavenly
ideals are perceived as though "through a glass dimly." These words are echoed by
Paul in 1 Corinthians 13:12.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostle_Paul#Literary_analysisIf Paul kept up with philosophy, I don't think he'd have argued for intelligent
design. Maybe he'd have known about Mortimer Adler ("How to Think About God"). -
47
It's Time to Dump the Hebrew Scriptures.
by smmcroberts inwhy do christian religions continue to pretend that the hebrew scriptures (aka the old testament) is god-inspired and that it describes a loving god?
don't they see that the ot is largely an embarrassment to its believers?
please read my blog to see why i think christianity should dispense with the ot all together:.
-
-
-
24
What is the essential difference between ridicule and reasoned debate?
by Terry inintellectual honesty requires that ideas get a fair hearing in discussion, debate and conversation.. can we agree on that?.
holding persons or ideas up to ridicule has a different effect, however.
it silences the fair hearing.
-
-
-
78
Watchtower Corporation enters new business to help sheeples see that the end is very, very near!
by Billy the Ex-Bethelite inmy dad heard from the co who heard from a do that heard from his brother-in-law that heard from the friend of a governing body's wife, that the gb is getting very concerned that "the friends" are losing sight of the nearness of the panda-petting paradise.
many of these friends are also looking too critically at the "spiritual food" provided by the "faithful slave class.".
don't tell anyone else, but i hear that the gb has begun testing something new on some of the sheeple.
-
-
-
47
It's Time to Dump the Hebrew Scriptures.
by smmcroberts inwhy do christian religions continue to pretend that the hebrew scriptures (aka the old testament) is god-inspired and that it describes a loving god?
don't they see that the ot is largely an embarrassment to its believers?
please read my blog to see why i think christianity should dispense with the ot all together:.
-
-
glenster
glenster: In other words, the people were more HUMANe than the god their
priests had created.The stickler there is over what was created. It's debatable whether or not the
Talmud reflects the BC interpretation of the stubborn son, so none can say it's a
later change. But if what's asked is what to make of a worst case interpreta-
tion, I don't assume that, either. I'm not worried about literal kids killed in
an allegorical flood, for example, like a Jack Albertson of the OT. I love
GTA's. Another post questions whether or not we need to use a worst case inter-
pretation of the bears as well. Amalekites, etc.:"Herem or cherem...as used in the Hebrew Bible, means ‘devote’ or ‘destroy’.
It is also referred to as the ban. The term has been explained in different ways
by scholars. It has been defined as 'a mode of secluding, and rendering harm-
less, anything imperilling the religious life of the nation,' or 'the total
destruction of the enemy and his goods at the conclusion of a campaign,' or "un-
compromising consecration of property and dedication of the property to God with-
out possibility of recall or redemption. J. A. Thompson suggests that herem
meant that in the hour of victory all that would normally be regarded as booty,
including the inhabitants of the land, was to be devoted to God. Thus would every
harmful thing be burned out and the land purified.""Most scholars conclude that the biblical accounts of extermination are exag-
gerated, fictional, or metaphorical. In the archaeological community, the Bat-
tle of Jericho is very thoroughly studied, and the consensus of modern scholars
is that the story of battle and the associated extermination are a pious fiction
and did not happen as described in the Book of Joshua. For example, the Book of
Joshua describes the extermination of the Canaanite tribes, yet at a later time,
Judges 1:1-2:5 suggests that the extermination was not complete."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkhemet_MitzvahSince I understand faith in a possible God, therefore not wanting harm over
it as for a God proven to all, I regard the move from OT to NT, from hope for a
land with religion as law of the land to not asking for that, as an improvement
in how the faith evolved--not a move from faith. But I regard belief or non-be-
lief made law of the land as institutionalized 'centric intolerance that's caused
the most harm. The culprit to me isn't God with a need to find something humane
otherwise but to see it as a choice whether or not to have faith understood as
such, and the culprit is being 'centric or intolerant either way.
