Latte:
You’re welcome. That same C.O., in an apparent effort to somehow portray himself an ‘expert’ on depression (his closing talk) made mention that he had a stack this thick (he gestured indicating approximately two inches) of articles from the Watchtower and the Awake on ‘low emotions.’ Of course what ALL those articles end up prescribing is: More meetings and more field service! Yeah! Meanwhile I’m shaking my head.
Pork Chop:
That’s been a battle strategy of theirs for a very long time. Put just enough there in the articles to fire up bozo’s like the one we had and let them run flat out. If they fall on their faces, no problem. “We never said it in the literature!” Alas!, 1975 revisited all over again.
Sexy:
Yes, it’s just that stupid.
Lv4fer:
Exactly. The strange and baffling thing is that no one is able to see that.
Amnesian:
I find it interesting that you should mention “Schindler’s List” . A brother told me (this past Sunday) that his wife got on his case for seeing an “R” rated movie. He quickly pointed out to her that they had a video tape of …”Schindler’s List”. She quickly replied: “Yes, but that’s historical” and then he replies “Is that the criteria? If something is historical then it’s okay if it’s “R” rated?” She had no response when she realized just how silly this was getting.
How a religious organization professing to be Christian determines that it does not violate the individual conscience of and its true obligation toward its adherents in saddling them with the endless dictates of its own voluminous Law Code(s) still mystifies, even when referencing an organization as iron-fisted in its control as the WTS.I quite agree. They are, in fact, denying these individuals their right AND obligation to exercise their free will in conjunction with what they believe to be right and wrong. They are denying them a conscience. THAT is a sin, a sin just as heinous as any they are trying to “prevent”. Like I read somewhere: God wants spiritual fruit…not religious nuts!