Is the fact that they are printing fewer magazines, like having just one Watchtower for a whole month indicate financial troubles?
Definitly a cost saving measure.
is the fact that they are printing fewer magazines, like having just one watchtower for a whole month indicate financial troubles?.
definitly a cost saving measure.. www.isnrblog.com.
Is the fact that they are printing fewer magazines, like having just one Watchtower for a whole month indicate financial troubles?
Definitly a cost saving measure.
any thoughts?.
it would be easy to do, but if found out could be very embarrasing!!.
has anyone looked into this?
You would think so. I know that for years they would almost never respond to any negative news ect.
Now, they sue to have apostate websites shut down. That's a little paranoid to me.
any thoughts?.
it would be easy to do, but if found out could be very embarrasing!!.
has anyone looked into this?
I guess I am being paranoid. After all, there is no reason to suspect an organization that changes it's beliefs and denies it, brainwashes it's membership, is so secretive about who and how the NWT was translated and irresponsibly creates an situation perfect for pedophiles to practice their passions, among many other questionable practices.
Silly me!
I have to go. I'm having lunch with Big Foot's sister and I have to pick out my aluminum foil tux for the wedding.
any thoughts?.
it would be easy to do, but if found out could be very embarrasing!!.
has anyone looked into this?
Any thoughts?
It would be easy to do, but if found out could be very embarrasing!!
Has anyone looked into this? I have a friend who is a super geek and I was going to have him look at it, but why reinvent the wheel if it's already been done.
Fred www.isnrblog.com
recently i asked the question about lawsuits that the society brought against certain websites.
i got a lot of good information.
it seems, of course that the watchtower society, in typical fashion, will by any means suppress an opposing view.
Moshe, I agree too. Any long term exposure to the "Apostate sites" would raise serious questions in any rational mind.
recently i asked the question about lawsuits that the society brought against certain websites.
i got a lot of good information.
it seems, of course that the watchtower society, in typical fashion, will by any means suppress an opposing view.
Thanks. I will also link to your site. Very nice work! Lots of good stuff.
I agree. I am not going to be shut up because someone disagrees with me. I understand the copyright laws and respect everyones rights. But if your membership distributes a magazine to the public, the law allows you to repreduce it, if you acknowledge the source. You can also critique it.
Fred www.isnrblog.com
recently i asked the question about lawsuits that the society brought against certain websites.
i got a lot of good information.
it seems, of course that the watchtower society, in typical fashion, will by any means suppress an opposing view.
That's what I'm talking about! I would also wonder if there isn't a little spyware on the Watchtower CD.
recently i asked the question about lawsuits that the society brought against certain websites.
i got a lot of good information.
it seems, of course that the watchtower society, in typical fashion, will by any means suppress an opposing view.
Recently I asked the question about lawsuits that the Society brought against certain websites. I got a lot of good information. It seems, of course that the Watchtower Society, in typical fashion, will by any means suppress an opposing view. I would think “the truth” would withstand any challenge, but apparently not. No level playing field here. If any of you peons dare cross us, will sue the s**t out of you.
As in most of the cases, had they actually gone to court, the defendants would likely have won, first amendment and all. But the power of big corporate dollars to control the flow of information and to squelch any descent is alive and well in the bowels of Brooklyn Bethel.
Basically, who could afford to defend themselves from the onslaught of the Watchtower pocketbook?
I am ranting off subject here. How did they know about these sites? They obviously know about many other sites so it begs the question, do they monitor apostate sites? It looks like they do.
I have been to many Q&A’s, discussion boards, ex JW support sites and there seems to be one or more persons who will quickly answer or comment with a very well thought out and worded reply or post. Is there evidence that the Society, while chastising its membership to stay away from these sites is monitoring them and waiting to unleash the next series of lawsuits?
Two days after I started my blog www.isnrblog.com, I got an email from this “friendly” but inquisitive Witness, who asked a lot of questions and had some comments to my posts that seemed too canned. It was an awful lot like “Bethel Speak”. I asked him outright if he was connected to the organization, other than being your run of the mill JW. He made some benign reply and he never returned.
I don’t give a s**t except for the fact that this could easily turn into an embarrassing incident for the Watchtower Society and I would not want to miss being part of it.
Anyone with a thought?
Fred www.isnrblog.com
i mentioned some of this in another post like the choice nyc real estate angle they own.. .
also, in a non profit corp, the way the board members can profit is to say, set up a company that sells ink and sell it to the society.
the irs is tightening up on non profits, where officers or board members profit directly or indirectly, to prevent such a scenario.
i mentioned some of this in another post like the choice nyc real estate angle they own.. .
also, in a non profit corp, the way the board members can profit is to say, set up a company that sells ink and sell it to the society.
the irs is tightening up on non profits, where officers or board members profit directly or indirectly, to prevent such a scenario.
I mentioned some of this in another post like the choice NYC real estate angle they own.
Also, in a non profit corp, the way the board members can profit is to say, set up a company that sells ink and sell it to the Society. The IRS is tightening up on non profits, where officers or board members profit directly or indirectly, to prevent such a scenario. This type of thing happens all the time.
Think about it. If the GB members set up trucking, insurance, packaging companies or simply sales companies that they ran building supplies through, they could make billions. The Corp. i.e. the Society would show no profit, yet it bought 10 million dollars in ink from some other for profit corp.
Incidentally, this type of stuff happens all the time. Like I said the IRS is tightening up on it but I'm sure their are loopholes.
What am I missing?
Fred www.isnrblog.com