After reading the preceding posts I wish life gives me the opportunity to have a conversation with Jeff while quaffing some beers. I have the feling we would be good friends.
winstonchurchill
JoinedPosts by winstonchurchill
-
113
Hypothetically, If Someone Created a Fake Congregation to Trick Another...
by OnTheWayOut inlet's just stay hypothetical.
if someone wanted to create a fake congregation in 7-miles-from-nowhere, north dakota (7-m-f-n, n.d. congregation) in order to trick the elders at another congregation, what could they get away with?.
just assume that they use a p.o.
-
113
Hypothetically, If Someone Created a Fake Congregation to Trick Another...
by OnTheWayOut inlet's just stay hypothetical.
if someone wanted to create a fake congregation in 7-miles-from-nowhere, north dakota (7-m-f-n, n.d. congregation) in order to trick the elders at another congregation, what could they get away with?.
just assume that they use a p.o.
-
winstonchurchill
it's about deliberate trickery and lies and your justifying them.
Yep, you got THAT right; after years of training from the WTS, that's the way to go. Like they say "You can take the man out of the WTS, but you can't take the WTS out fo the man".
We learned form the best at "deliberate trickery and lies and [...] justifying them."
-
113
Hypothetically, If Someone Created a Fake Congregation to Trick Another...
by OnTheWayOut inlet's just stay hypothetical.
if someone wanted to create a fake congregation in 7-miles-from-nowhere, north dakota (7-m-f-n, n.d. congregation) in order to trick the elders at another congregation, what could they get away with?.
just assume that they use a p.o.
-
winstonchurchill
Isaac,
As far as I know, only the original comitee has to sign on the reinstatement. I have not been involved in a reinstatement for about 4 years, but until then the original comitee was to inform WT about the resintatement via s-77. Maybe now they require letters from both comittes but I don't recall such instruction.
-
113
Hypothetically, If Someone Created a Fake Congregation to Trick Another...
by OnTheWayOut inlet's just stay hypothetical.
if someone wanted to create a fake congregation in 7-miles-from-nowhere, north dakota (7-m-f-n, n.d. congregation) in order to trick the elders at another congregation, what could they get away with?.
just assume that they use a p.o.
-
winstonchurchill
Vinny, all due respect, you must have been a hell of a witness: dogmatic, opinionated and condescending. And you ain't got over it, no matter what you think.
Regarding what Snakes wrote and you quoted, NO, a secretary's 'natural' reaction won't be calling Patterson. Your average secretary will not call Patterson to confirm an address or a phone as a regular procedure. They may call to get such information if they don't have it; but if they have a name, an address and a phone number, they will not double check with the offices (why would they?). Some may do it, but they are not mandated to do so, and most I know will just try to get in contact with original committee over the phone (WT warns against Mobiles and wireless, but using landlines is perfectly OK, and contrary to what was stated it does not violate WT protocol).
That being said, I agree the 'fake congregation' plot has many holes and there's a good chance it would get caught.
As for the motivation, I agree that it seems a bit pathetic so much effort to be in good standing within an organization you hate. But, on the other hand, I can relate to the pain that being shunned causes; there's no limits to what one would do for parents and children and loved ones.
So no judging here. I would not be surprised to it works, I would not be surprised to see it fail. I've seen weirder things happen.
-
44
The most absurd comments yet about oral sex !!!
by Sour Grapes ini visited a kh today with my wife and the brother who gave the public talk.
said that there is so much unnatural use of the sex organs by the world's.
youth, that the medical field is encouraging all parents with children 12 years.
-
winstonchurchill
You can't take the world over while doing a BJ. You can't even drive a car.. didn't we cover this?
Sorry ATJeff, but I HATE IT when 'BJ' and 'cover' are in the same sentence!
-
46
A little advice needed on disassociating myself
by MisfitMeL inyes i know i tend to post here only when i need advice or have something to rant about .
so i'm living in the uk but leaving very shortly to go back to my home country of india and try my career luck there (what with the recession and all that).
i'll be living with my mum for a while and i am soooo not looking forward to it.
-
winstonchurchill
1) Don't DA. Manys cons, almost no pros.
2) Don't plan based on "she'll understand". Self afliction is a big thing for JW. Remember: suffering is a sign that you are worth of being tested by god. They like suffering and crying and 'enduring penalties'. So by DA or announcing you no longer wish to be a JW, what will probably happen is she (with help from the ever present zealots) will turn it into 'suffering', being tested and a great oportunity to show how loyal to god she is.
3) Your publisher card: don't let it follow you. Once those in possesion of the card can't reach you, you are out for almost all practical purposes. Let it stay were it is!
4) Fade. Fade. Fade. As per #2 she'll find solace in enduring your being 'inactive', and will cry over it, but she'll hope you'll "come back to your senses". But ties won't be severed.
-
14
Have you heard of the Field Service Application on the I-phone for JW's?
by awildflower inok, so i'm technically challenged and i don't use the i-phone, but my 19 year old son does and he just showed me this application for jw's and keeping track of their field service!
it shows maps, keeps track of time, addresses , even how to e-mail time to three different addresses!...............here's the thing: how many jw's would know about this if we have always been encouraged to not get to involved in technology.
they would dog technology but i'll bet they will use this on an assembly someday to show how jehovah has blessed them and look at the new tool he has given them and aren't we special.
-
winstonchurchill
Our TMS Overseer uses a program he downloaded from the internet. The thing keeps track and controls the whole process. Pretty cool if you ask me.
Also the secretary uses downloaded software to keep all the cong. records. Indeed I know fro a fact that fellow elders have frown upon this, but he sticks to his guns an even CO's have told him nothing wrong with that.
Also CO's use computers to prepare and store their reports and letters. I did that, and the official WT position was that it shouldn't be done, but we did it anyway.
This is an area where disobedience is widespread amongst JW's.
-
51
letter of disassociation from a Christian
by reniaa inhttp://thetruthaboutthetruthaboutthetruth.blogspot.com/2005/08/i-have-decided-to-leave-this.html.
i have decided to leave this organization!--a letter from a first century christian.
hi, brothers and sisters.
-
winstonchurchill
And by the way, why is this sanctimonious 'sister' devoting so much time to associate with apostates and DF’d people?
Isn't that against the rules of WTS? Do you know you can be Df'd for that?
In other words, and as a tribute to the late (and DF'd) Bro. Jackson: BEAT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
60
Ex jw wife
by sspo ini find it interesting that i posted about 16 days ago concerning whether i should write a letter and.
allow my ex wife to be free and marry.. saturday night she called out of the blue ( maybe there is a god upthere looking down) after 3 years of not talking to her and she wants to meets.. we met last night and after small talk about how we are both doing and family stuff, she asked me if i would write a letter.
freeing her or releasing her from our marriage without admitting adultery, since i don't believe in the bible anymore,.
-
winstonchurchill
The fact that Reniaa is advising you to write the letter should be conclusive proof that you should not write it.
-
82
Is the Downfall of Jehovah's Witnesses More Important Then You?
by AllTimeJeff in(on proofreading this, i feel that this is more preachy then i meant it.
so as a disclaimer, i hope you know that if you get that impression, that i didn't mean it that way.
having said that, this is what i feel, so if you relate to this in any way, enjoy.
-
winstonchurchill
Outlaw:
"Egregious"..Notably Bad..Flaggrant..................................After a few beer..Also Flatuent................................LOL!!...OUTLAW
Sorry about that. In Spanish (my original language) 'Egregio" means notable, outstanding. I just transliterated. BTW If you look up "Egregious" in some dictionaries it will give you a secondary meaning:
archaic : distinguished
Anyhoo, I meant you people are outstanding and remarkable.