so get this, wt has something they're calling a "jw box" that gives people in africa "spiritual food".
the best part, they want donations of $75 for it!
so they don't provide any physical food to people in africa but they can send them "spiritual food" for $75.
It's telling that the video explaining how the box will work concludes by showing a small African girl putting money in the contribution box (so she can be just like Sophie!)
The African JWs are complaining that they can't access spiritual food and have family worship, etc., because they can't watch the videos. Um...didn't JWs manage just fine for, oh, I don't know--that last CENTURY without videos?
i recently created a discord server in order to create a community of exjw and associated ones.
the decision to create it came from a desire to have an inclusive and safe environment for those affected by the wt.
one in which we can share ideas and experiences, and meet other people with similar interests.
Mike1--Can you resend the Invite? It says it is invalid.
my husband insist that i talk to the elders.
it is something i 100% plan on doing for the simple fact of my relationship with him.
i know some of you may disagree but it seems like the best option for us.. problem/question: .
Unlikely, sorry to hear you are in this tough situation. I'm curious as to how your husband justifies his own situation, which JWs would consider weak at best and probably in line to bite it at Armagg. It is one thing for an uber-zealous mate to want you to meet with the elders, something quite different for someone who is barely a JW.
As far as meeting with them, if you think it is necessary for your marriage, based on your husband's wishes, then you probably should go ahead with it. But as others have pointed out, it is likely not to make much difference. Still, if you prepare well and have evidence to back up your "concerns" and keep a calm and mild voice/attitude (you know how JWs esp. elders look for that, particularly in women), it might go okay.
Keep us posted. As a POMO wife to a sweet but still very much PIMI elder husband, I can understand your feelings.
i know i shouldn't--i tell myself this over and over--but i can't help peeking at these silly articles.
and then i see this and my head really starts hurting: so the gannet, if you don't know (and why would you?
) is a seabird that feeds on fish.
I know--the lack of logical thought is mind-boggling.
i know i shouldn't--i tell myself this over and over--but i can't help peeking at these silly articles.
and then i see this and my head really starts hurting: so the gannet, if you don't know (and why would you?
) is a seabird that feeds on fish.
I know I shouldn't--I tell myself this over and over--but I can't help peeking at these silly articles. And then I see this and my head really starts hurting: So the gannet, if you don't know (and why would you?) is a seabird that feeds on fish. It dives to great depths in its hunting (okay, fishing). So this silly article on JW.Org is all about how amazing the bird's diving ability is, how deep it can go, how easily it pops back up to the surface "when finished diving." What is strikingly omitted is WHY the bird is diving. But of course, that little pebble in the JW shoe is ignored.
What do you think? Did the gannet’s diving ability evolve? Or was it designed?Well, JW, if it was DESIGNED, that means God DESIGNED the bird to eat meat (well, fish). And how do you reconcile that with your literal eisegesis? Hmm?
elections have been held per the us constitution during many difficult times; us civil war, ww i, ww ii, whatever.
i just put on the pro-trump fox news and even they are saying ... oooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.. this is really scary.
are we headed towards a dictatorship?
LV101, it is my understanding that there is not one molecule of evidence supporting the assertion of mail-in ballot fraud. However, if you actually have evidence, please include a link to the source. I am interested.
there's yet another talk to add to the list of talks written specifically for damage control against "apostates".
the speaker says, "some who were once part of the christian congregation attempt to mislead us", that they tell "false accusations" & "lies".
to combat this, he says that you should "protect your ears from damaging noise by not listening to it", comparing it to wearing "noise canceling headphones".
OMG, those danishes were SO good!!! I got free food tix as a pioneer and would stock up!
the latest wt celebrates the 100th anniversary of 1920 with an article about what happened that year:.
on march 21, 1920, joseph f. ruther-ford .
spoke on the subject“millions now living will never die.” the bi-ble students left no stone unturned in theirquest to invite interested ones to this event.they rented one of the largest theaters innew york city and distributed some 320,-000 invitations.the public responded beyond all expecta-tions.
Interesting how when the serpent aka Satan, in the Garden of Eden, says to Eve, "you will not die," it is a lie, but when Rutherford said the same thing in 1920, it was "good news," and "one of the most successful meetings ever held."
dress up for the show.
... and now please be seated.
proudly presenting your 2020 convention program.. ... and, thank god, for the ff button on my player.
It's a bit of a joke. My elder husband "watched" the Friday sessions as background noise while he worked on the computer (secular work, as they say). I strongly suspect he was not the only one. At least he's multi-tasking instead of giving up an entire day.
So much for sacred service, as it used to be called. Or maybe still is. Who knows. Who cares.
as the altleftist idiots burn books, ban speech and now ban movies that does not conform to their twisted thinking never forget, those that start by burning books end up burning bodies.
.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/business/media/gone-with-the-wind-hbo-max.html.
Millie210, I agree. This is actually a great example of how a very complex issue (the reality of racism) is being handled in an over-simplistic, knee-jerk reactive way. Yes, GWTW has troubling elements but it also showcased the first black actress to win an Oscar so doesn't removing it discredit McDaniel? The fact is that it was a product of its time, for bad, yes AND for good. Viewing it solely through the lens of racism shuts out the fact that it is far more of a feminist bildungsroman than anything else. Scarlet O'Hara is a remarkable protagonist, not because of her love affair with Rhett Butler, but because she spurred traditional female limitations of her day. Yes, the horrors of slavery are completely ignored and I can understand why some would feel that in and of itself is grounds for censorship (and that's what this is, folks) but I think Mitchell was focused on doing something else with the story. And of course, critics can say well she SHOULD have been focused on depicting slavery in all its horror but when you start telling authors what they should and shouldn't be writing in their works of fiction, then fiction is essentially dead.
