"BonaFide, if you get the chance, I wish you could ask these people why they think it's "critical" to simply mention what's in the literature and what the latest "new light" is. If you're helping them learn to think, help them to see that all you did was bring out what the WTS said IN ITS OWN LITERATURE and that THEY, not you, became upset by it. Why were they upset? Don't they trust the FDS? Don't they accept the New Light? Ask them why they are so defensive~is it a sign they aren't putting their trust in the GB?"
Good one, StAnn! Nice 'turning it back on them' with a twist!!
Moshe - "and had an actuary look into it in the early 80's. Starting with the figures given in the 1930's for the partakers and asumming a a very young average age of 35 for them, the actuary claculated that there should only be about 3500 partakers left alive by 1984- less than 1/2 of the numbers given in the yearbook. By 1994 it should have been no more than 1000 and the last one would have left the building by the year 2000..."
Wicked! Cool!
Good points, Winston Churchill; "WTS is taking advantage of that, and they have learned form their previous fisacos, so they start with an obscure QFR (that most won't even read), then they put in ambiguous words in a study article, kind of hidden..." "
Then comes a CO/DO at an assembly and presents that same information in a very sensationalistic way, twisting it to make it look like (a) we're closer to the end; and (b) FDS is soooooo wise, that everyone now 'understands' and applauds. If and when the 'new understanding' falls apart, WTS can always hide behind the fact that they never said there was a change."
and leavingWT; "Understanding new light is pointless to an active JW...... Why bother? It will simply change again."
TrevorScott, I think you're attributing waaay too much intelligence to the Governing Body.... But I loved your comment anyway!
OUTLAW - "crazier than a dog at a dinosaur dig!" 
Loosie! Thinking is what those nasty, Satan-inspiredcollege graduates do!!
Zid
