UB,
I know goes over some of the solid historical work carried out by Baigent and Lee in the books:The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception
The Holy Blood and The Holy grail
The Messianic Legacy
Templars and Freemasons (can't remmember the exact title)
+ several others
Let me get it straight right away: these are not in any way respected scholarly works. They are mass marketed conspiracy theories with little merit.
There may be much interesting stuff in them, and some facts, but they do not represent any scholarly consensus. Not even close.
While it was clearly unethical practices from some scholars that led them to monopolize control of the Scrolls, it is laughable it had anything to do with the Vatican.
Since then, these scrolls have been published, and Christianity is just as invulnerable to historical facts as it always was.
Just so nobody gets mislead that these books represent a scholarly opinion, except at best a single minority voice. By all means, read it, but be skeptical, and read what others say on the subject.
- Jan
--
Faith, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel. [Ambrose Bierce, The Devil´s Dictionary, 1911]