http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
Wow, never heard that story before wolfman.
It's crazy that kids can't drive until they are 15 or 16, drink until 21, but the law lets them handle and shoot uzi's with no age limit? So far an 8yr old and 9yr old both resulting in deaths, I wonder if any younger ones just hadn't happened yet.
this pisses me off, after all the news agencies that point out that things such as the ferguson shooting were a white man killing a black "kid" (18 years old and if an 18 yr old is accused of commiting a sex crime then suddenly they are a "grown man").
now look at this story from ny times, "a 32-year-old marine was beaten by a group of men outside of a mississippi restaurant after he was warned it wasn't safe for white people in the wake of the michael brown killing in missouri," .
so black on white crime, i guess they can't say "a group of black men", it just has to be a group of men?
As you can see in the story, about 20 'black men' attacked the 2 'white men' and the police have said, like usual, " "This does not appear to be a hate crime," West Point Police Chief Tim Brinkley.
Yes it is a hate crime. I guess reporting and charging like the truth they are worried they'll be another chimp out?
this pisses me off, after all the news agencies that point out that things such as the ferguson shooting were a white man killing a black "kid" (18 years old and if an 18 yr old is accused of commiting a sex crime then suddenly they are a "grown man").
now look at this story from ny times, "a 32-year-old marine was beaten by a group of men outside of a mississippi restaurant after he was warned it wasn't safe for white people in the wake of the michael brown killing in missouri," .
so black on white crime, i guess they can't say "a group of black men", it just has to be a group of men?
This pisses me off, after all the news agencies that point out that things such as the ferguson shooting were a white man killing a black "kid" (18 years old and if an 18 yr old is accused of commiting a sex crime then suddenly they are a "grown man").
Now look at this story from NY times, " A 32-year-old Marine was beaten by a group of men outside of a Mississippi restaurant after he was warned it wasn't safe for white people in the wake of the Michael Brown killing in Missouri,"
So black on white crime, I guess they can't say "a group of black men", it just has to be a group of men?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/marine-beaten-warned-wasn-safe-wake-michael-brown-killing-article-1.1917685#ixzz3BekL8A2u
when people willfully believe something without evidence, or contrary to evidence, are they neglecting thier moral responsibility?
so many people say faith is a virtue but i just can't comprehend why anyone would think that.
.
Whether faith is immoral is sujective to the results of that faith.
A person who has faith that putting others needs ahead of their own and sacrificing some opportunities in their life for helping others will result in a better future or afterlife for them, that isn't immoral. (immoral is also subjective though to each individuals viewpoints).
Now take ISIS, they have 'faith' (if they really believe) or just using it as an excuse, that murdering non believers of their cult will give them a good afterlife is immoral.
i often download open yale courses audio for my mp3 player.
i work repatative in the morning so get 3-4 hours of courses,.
one done today on the philosephy of death made a point.. if you lived 300 years you might might still remember childhood.. 500 year childhood might be gone and by then you are not the same person you were at 50. in fat you might not even rmembe you were that person!.
Either way though, the JW version of 'the last days' and 'the end' is not what the scriptures teach, they have tons of things all mixed up.
i often download open yale courses audio for my mp3 player.
i work repatative in the morning so get 3-4 hours of courses,.
one done today on the philosephy of death made a point.. if you lived 300 years you might might still remember childhood.. 500 year childhood might be gone and by then you are not the same person you were at 50. in fat you might not even rmembe you were that person!.
I'd love to live forever, but either as spirit or if human then with star trek technology and infinite other planets to live in and explore. This planet is small after you have traveled all over.
O and another response to OP's post, so do you wish you were dead right now? Are you upset that the person you were when you were 3 years old, 6 years old, 10, 15, 20, etc, are all long gone?
We also only use a fraction of our brain, there is a man who has remembered EVERY day of his life and if given any day he can tell you what occured that day. (forgot the name but I'm sure google can find it quickly if you are interested).
pay attention to what you are told, and how it is presented.. what is the actual message being communicated?
what is the intention behind it?.
this 128-page book millions now living will never die, was placed with the people on a contribution of 25c a copy.. .
Good quote and pictures. Now 3 additional quotes and pictures that would nicely supplement that are.....
1. The printed material that says that he never said 1925 was certain, only a possibility and it's everybody elses fault for taking it so seriously.
2. The quote about how dead anointed brothers such as Russell are directing the work and involved in the new light.
3. The quote about how he never said such a thing that any dead anointed brother was doing anything and whoever thought such crap is a dumbass.
"go where the need is great"... it's one of those jw buzz-words/phrases.
almost like a secret code that just pops up in what would otherwise be a 'normal' conversation.. .
i was conducting an interview with a candidate this afternoon and she used this phrase when explaining that she travelled to various locations of a previous employer.
Not that exact phrase but many other churches set up missions, etc, for countries and poor areas that need help.
any suggestions on a new razor?
i kind of want to try a safety double edge but im so used to the store brand razors.
any one here own a safety doubleedge or a straight edge?.
To quit the tracking and adds, if you use google chrome, for EVERY site you visit for the next week or 2, right click on it and click on the screen, then click on "page info' then under the permissions tab, click on "show cookies and site data". Then block every cookie that is not relevant to the website and all obvious advertising cookies. Some websites will only have a few, and some websites like yahoo.com you will have to cycle through a few times because they'll throw 100 cookies/websites at you to try to track. After a few days to a week you'll be track free without the hassle of blocking all cookies and unable to do much.
Right now there are shaving ads on this page, but that's probably because of the words in this thread.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/index.html?hpt=hp_t2.
"a 9-year-old girl learning to fire a submachine gun accidentally killed her instructor at a shooting range when the weapon recoiled over her shoulder, according to arizona authorities.
another reason to go against those arguing that young children should be taught how to use guns.
A few posts asking if there is ever a need for an uzi. The only time I can think it might be appropriate would be for instance the owner of that quickstop that was looted and burned down. If he had been inside the store w/ an uzi, he could have mowed down the horde of criminals that spewed inside after breaking in the door.
