Awesome Paul. Thanks for going through all of that and then sharing it.
From the CO's report....
.... he didn't want to be disfellowshipped himself. Elders are certain that his motivation for this is so that he can continue association with his Witness parents and other family members.
Hey, no kidding? Seriously?
Now this, from an elder's written and filed report:
Michael made the call to Paul's mobile with Luc present, and stated: "...we will not put our decision in writing, and our decision is to take disfellowshipping action..."
Now this is extremely interesting to me from a legal standpoint. Even though your privacy case never made it to the courts and so cannot create precedent from that perspective, here is a finding that could be very useful legally.
The WBTS doesn't put disfellowshipping decisions into writing to the victims, only makes them verbally, specifically so that legal action is almost impossible. Here you have a written admission of a decision.
So the learning here is that for others who may want to pursue legal action against their disfellowshipping, extracting documents like this through privacy laws can cut right through the society's fearful "nothing in writing" policy.