"Do as you want, as long as no one gets hurt."
That is a value statement; a statement asserting a moral stand, a judgment on what constitutes right and wrong.
So, hurting someone is wrong? And if an act does not "hurt" someone, then it is okay?
Define "hurt," please.
More importantly, how do you know hurting someone is wrong? On what grounds do you make that assertion?
Seems to me you are trying to claim moral relativism regards to some acts and a moral absolute to others.
You can not have it both ways. Either there is an objective standard (moral obsolute) to measure human behavior or there is not. There is no fence riding on this matter.