hosea 6:7-9 like earthing man have overstepped the covenant.
there is where they have dealt treacherously with me.
gilead is a town of practicers of what is harmful; their footprints are in blood.
I know it's going to happen, just hope get it figured out before it does.
Do you even know what "it" is?
Can you imagine finding and reading things in the bible, that you feel you can't even mention because of the consequences if it's wrong?
No worries. You're wrong.
hosea 6:7-9 like earthing man have overstepped the covenant.
there is where they have dealt treacherously with me.
gilead is a town of practicers of what is harmful; their footprints are in blood.
Most of his articles can be easily shown as opinion with many wrong ... claims. I hope none being ensnared, just take it as opinions.
What about what you think?
adam and eve were to eat of any of the trees of the garden except the one.
they must have been fruit trees, since they were to eat of them.
eating (and drinking) in the bible is figurative of partaking of a message.
The meaning is far more important than whether the story is to be taken as literal or allegorical.
Don't listen to talking snakes?
Don't beleive everything you hear?
will it be obama or someone else?.
Ben Franklin.
Actually, I totally support that. Why? Ben was the master of dickjitsu...
From Cracked....
Of all the great things Ben Franklin was known for--lightning rods, bifocals, love of French prostitutes--journalistic integrity isn't on the list. But what he did have was a gigantic set he loved to show off. For one thing, Franklin wrote and distributed a supplement to the Boston Independent Chronicle reporting that American Indians were sending the British Royal Court hundreds of American scalps, the implication being that the British troops were using ruthless, child hating Indian-mercenaries to help them win the Revolutionary War.
The news outraged Americans, horrified British citizens and, when word reached the British Royal Court, deeply confused the monarchy, as they had yet to receive any scalps. Franklin wrote the supplement to garner support from European nations for the U.S., and it totally worked. The kicker? The last American Revolution battle ended in October of the previous year, which made the supplement unnecessary and balltuitous. (Balls + gratuitous. Look it up.)
Still, that's not quite as bizarre and dickish as what Franklin did to Titan Leeds. Publishing under his Richard Saunders pseudonym in his famous Poor Richard's Almanac, in between weather predictions and crop suggestions, Franklin predicted the death of Leeds, a rival almanac owner. When the predicted day arrived and Leeds, predictably, was still alive, Franklin decided to report and confirm the death anyway.
Leeds desperately published his counter-argument ("No I'm not.") but Franklin, an accomplished black belt in the subtle art of being a dick (or, "dickjitsu") pushed his lie even further and reported that, not only did Leeds die, but he was replaced by an impostor who was shamelessly hijacking the Leeds name to continue publishing almanacs. When Leeds eventually did die (five years after Franklin had predicted it), you'd think Franklin would come clean, but that's because you are, at best, a dickjitsu yellow belt.
Instead, in an act of unequaled dickishness, Franklin came out and congratulated the Leeds impostor for finally owning up to their lie and ending the whole charade (by dying). To reiterate, a guy's death is wrongfully reported, that guy tries to correct the mistake, Franklin calls him a shameless fraud and, at his death, congratulates him for dying. Textbook dickjitsu.
i hate to exercise, therefore i haven't really ever done it, and stuck with it.
i've had 6 children, and am quite sedentary.
i get really bad migraines when my blood pressure rises, hence hating excercise.. .
I think I "went" where I did as a result of dear NVL's
Don't blame me for what you wrote.
I want to say "remembrance of what it was like"... but then I realize he probably indulged in a lot of self-loathing at the time (I'm thinking he had to, because he would necessarily want to include himself among those he has 100% disdain FOR... or admit his hypocrisy regarding the matter)
Hey, don't sell me short. I indulge in self loathing now.
i've never been one to believe in " ghosts " .
i'm open to the possibility that there may exist something in the afterlife or spirit world- i just don't know what it is.
having been out of the witnesses over 6 years i had my fill of being a jehovah's witness and being told how " scared " i should be of satan or the demons.
Fact: There may be ghosts
Fact: There are good worldly people.
I don't think the word fact means what you think it means. Perhaps something more along the lines of "it's possible but hundreds of years of searching and analysis have provided absolutely zero verifiable evidence" would be close for that first line.
Perfect analogy.
Except that your fact isn't a fact....
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html.
if you believe that the bible is gods word, don't you get sick of making excuses for all the contradictions?.
minimus.
No, it's called reading both sides of the issue. Something that you might try.
I thought you considered the bible supreme? That's what I was reading. Are you reading something else? Does Satan have a side I should be looking at?
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html.
if you believe that the bible is gods word, don't you get sick of making excuses for all the contradictions?.
minimus.
Oh, brother! If that's the best that infidels has, then they are not as impactful as they think they are.
I know, right? Reading comprehension is hard!
i can understand many argue that scientifically it is impossible for the earth to remain forever (sun dies).
what is wrong with the argument that god could refuel the sun?.
Lots of hand-waving explanations needed for the JW world-view of Armageddon killing off everyone but them, and then living on a paradise earth forever in violation of proven laws of physics.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
i can understand many argue that scientifically it is impossible for the earth to remain forever (sun dies).
what is wrong with the argument that god could refuel the sun?.
Perhaps you don't believe that the red sea was parted or the water turned to wine or that people where resurrected. To each the own I suppose.
I don't. I have no evidence. Why should I beleive that more an any other mythical story?
