The brother who gave the talk in the Congo I attend first gave an introduction saying what part we'd be considering, saying the title, then where the source info was from, then had his wife come up and do a presentation at the door. Then... he opened up the discussion by asking the audience "how would you respond to the question?"
At first I thought, maybe he knows TTATT and doesn't want to say anything himself. Then I thought, not this guy, he wants people in the audience to open themselves up and if anyone says anything not supportive of the current view then they'll be marking that one.
I don't know, maybe I'm being very paranoid. But it sure sounded to me like a trap to get those who do know the WTS has likened itself to an inspired prophet and made false prophesies to expose themselves by giving information that proves the WTS has acted in the past as a "false prophet".
Besides why title a part like this unless there are people out there actually claiming the WTS is a false prophet and requiring attention be given to this by the writers of the OKM rag.
