Canon Powershot SX50HS Digital Camera
Can a camera like this have any credibility in your realm.
i'm a nature photographer and like most always seeking better, longer glass.. i'm most attracted to the 600mm f4 is canon lens though some have suggested dropping down to a 500mm due to the weight issue.
both these lenses are heavy and i can't see myself lugging either one long distances without my modified baby stroller.. any experiences with either lens?
what tripod head are you using?.
Canon Powershot SX50HS Digital Camera
Can a camera like this have any credibility in your realm.
.
i'll start.
.
.
i'll start.
.
i don't know how to paste images from my smartphone but take a look on page 11 from today's watchtower (study edition) september 15, 2012.... .
is it just me or does jesus look like mitt romney???.
haha i have to read so i have no more time to talk but please let me know what you think!
three pics on page three don't look like lightening up, LOL
her church teaches that god.
never forgives suicide.
i showed her how the bible.
Her church teaches that God
never forgives suicide. But
I showed her how the Bible
gives a hope of a resurrection.
(John 5:28, 29)
thinking a lot last days about the new light about the fds, today i got an idea about the following.. - both the 1) annointed and 2) the rank and file witness aka great crowd are now part of the domestics.. so, in practice, it doesn't matter you have a heavenly or and earthly hope for the future.. because, the domestics can have a heavenly or an earthly hope.. what i think is that this part of the new light sets open the gates for jehovahs witnesses with a heavenly hope.. and more in future: how longer the "new systems of things" will stay away, the watchtower can switch to a doctrine with only a heavenly hope, "living for ever in a paradise in heaven".. what do you think about this?!?.
gorby.
I think with this "93 years later" change
what does this mean??
Gayle or anyone
following recent posts, articles, blogs (thanks cedar and others for their excellent work) i would like to contribute something, to show the hypocrisy and the constant doctrinal changes of the society.. .
to begin:.
qualified to be ministers (1955) p.156 par.
That is a lot of "good" research. You have to love it how you can pull up that much evidence from their own material that proves they don't have a clue.
somebody please explain this to me!.
last talk of the dc today,( i know everyone has already attended by now, i just put it off as long as possible) the bro.
read letter from gb about jah's stricking the jaw of the gov.
Yup. I had a good laugh and said so on the first time this was posted. I would like a little more info on the "Note they still have to now pay the tax, so they have not won!" comment. What exactly is the tax involving?
just re-discovered this gem:.
"it is a matter of fact that the history of the watchtower society is riddled with failed date-setting and abandoned doctrine,1 and the society has gone to great lengths to hide this past from its members.
older (incriminating) watchtower publications are virtually impossible to obtain through the society,2 while at the same time members are overwhelmed with "current" watchtower material.. the watchtower society has even gone as far as to publish disinformation about its own history in an attempt to convince readers that watchtower doctrine has remained consistent over the years, and that the society is not a false prophet.
@under the radar . . . I didn't try all the refences but for example http://www.strictlygenteel.co.uk/timeisathand/study7.html takes you to that reference work.
because they have been at it for years without producing a new recruit (bearing fruit) this snippet from the november km will/should comfort them.. .
3 how we bear much fruit: according to jesus' illustration, those who accept the.
message would "bear fruit.
@keyser . . . exactly. AND thus the need for the blurb to keep them at it even if they are becoming disillusioned. Not to worry if you have been at it for twenty years and nada, nuttin. Because if you buy our new little slant on it (maybe not totally new) but a little bit. you can keep at it and feel good. Just as long as we can convince you to keep at it to (as you put it) keep us unique.
Just my thought, but the effectiveness is not beside the point if you are talking about many of the r+f. If you are talking about the control freaks at the top, then yes. At the top they must keep up with the double speak in the effort to control, control and oh yes, did I mention control.