DarioKehl

Joined

• started 47 topics
• posted 704 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by DarioKehl

• 
  27

  Can an inactive one be DFed?

  by Eustace in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  on another thread somebody wrote:.

  i was df'd about a month ago and when it happened, i cried.

  i'm not sure why, i certainly don't believe one crumb of what they teach anymore, and i had been inactive for two years.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  I belive it's a matter of time before they make a policy to DF or preemptively shun faded or inactive ones. They can lump it under "brazen."

  Mark my words: In 2 year's time, we will see noo lite on this. They'll use that "rules, guidelines and principles" reasoning to invoke preshunning on anyone who's inactive more than 3-6 months. They'll put some kind of clause in it, of course, like: "Would it be wise for true christians to continue associating with fellow brothers and sisters who have become inactive or avoided congregation meetings after elders have made attempts to reach out to them?"

  It's just a matter of time. Our friends and family still inside will "apply" the new point and begin the snubbing. Or we may begin receiving a lot of "mom guilt emails" because they will have been encouraged to make one last attempt to get us reactivated. If we're not receptive, they'll be encouraged to treat us like "goats" or "weeds." Trust me. The GB will take things into their own hands and attempt a pre-judgment sorting and separating work. They'll have to. This fading thing is driving them crazy. With one or 2 powerful guilt trips in a WT article, they can issue a command and the R&F will react just like trained dobermans.
• 
  239

  A big shift in the world is about to happen......

  by EndofMysteries in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i don't want to deceive anyone and i have to clarify a few things so i'm sorry this is going to be a lot more vague then you want.

  infact if you do not already realize or also feel something is about to happen as in the title, then move along, it will be a month or 2 before i update this.

  it's not my intention to annoy anybody, i am too uncomfortable to post any details because it's too new and i need to verify things, and i am also feeling responsible to give a subtle warning, that it might be something somebody needs to see.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Have you been listening to that Lindsey Williams guy? This sounds like one of his "Folks, you're not gonna believe this... what I'm about to tell ya... i beg of you, folks..." tirades.

  This is vague. Anything can happen in 2-3 months (war involving Iran/Israel, another major natural disaster, another terror attack...). Anything. And all you have to do is wait for it, come back on here and claim that you knew about it before it happened. As a natural skeptic, I have to ask what your motive is for starting this thread in the first place.
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Ok. So we're cool then, yes?
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  BTW: Being a plumber doesn't subract from Susskind's credentials. Remember, Einstein turned the world of physics upside down when he submitted his Theory of Relativity and another paper explaining Brownian motion to the science journal "Annalen der Physik." He was working as a lowly clerk in a patent office. In other words, these great breakthroughs were written when he was a nobody and he did them, get this... on his free time.
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Keep in mind, in the world of academia and science, these guys have to "publish or perish." It's dog-eat-dog, every man for himself. To have findings published, your papers must be subject to extensive peer review and believe me, "peer" is a nice way of saying "other guys in your field who are dying to prove you wrong so they can advance." That's what makes science so trustworthy. People can't just say stuff. Or wing a paper and claim a new discovery. It's a bloody battle and people can get nasty. That ensures that any new knowledge added to these journals is refined, accurate and extremely reliable until another better equipped and smarter guy or gal comes along with new data that forces a change in understanding.

  (wouldn't it be nice to see this method applied for all articles published by the writing committee at WT?)
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  It's not impossible... you'd just need an anti-gravity generator to squish space time in front of the ship and stretch it out behind the ship---which physics proves would require energy equal to the output of an entire star's lifetime! People don't just make this stuff up out of thin air, Elderelite! "Theory" is often misunderstood as "hunch." In science, the word "theory" basically means "facts as observed now until newly discovered data requires an adjustment." Granted, much of these ideas cannot be tested on a macro level. But small observations in tests with subatomic particles confirm the mathematical predictions made by physicists. They also disprove a great deal and when that happens, no one gets upset. They're happy to have more work to do.
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Read his book. He talks all about it. Hawking later corrected himself as other scientists jumped on Susskind's bandwagon [They even had a couple of cute bets arranged (for $1 and another for a baseball encyclopedia)].

  Hawking claimed that information is lost forever upon entry into a black hole. Susskind argued that information cannot be destroyed, it must be conserved, otherwise all physical laws are in danger. Eventually, Hawking conceded and thus arose the idea of Hawking Radiation. It balanced the problem of information loss.

  Basically, information in the tiniest meaningful quantity is on the Planck scale. All "information" of matter can be broken down into these Planck-sized bits. Susskind showed that particles entering black holes encounter a strange world where 2 different outcomes become reality. One outcome is that the particle is destroyed forever. However, for observers outside the black hole, another equally true state of reality is that the particle becomes evenly dispersed across the surface area of the black hole in broken planck-sized bits. One "reality" is destruction, the "other reality" is the surface area of the black hole expanding with the addition of each particle. Both realities for one particle are true and exist simultaneously. It's weird, but his book explains it a lot better than I can.
• 
  45

  The WT Encourages JWs to learn about the early history of the organization! - 8/15/12 WT

  by 00DAD in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ironically, in today's wt, jws are encouraged to study the early history of the "earthly organization".

  like them [the sons of korah], do you have a desire to study and recount the history of the earthly part of jehovahs organization?

  the more you learn about gods organization and how jehovah supports his people, the more real gods kingdom will be to you.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  That's a shameless plug for their DVD lol.
• 
  12

  Question about the new "FDS" light

  by Indian Larry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  if the fds is only the governing body and the governing body of today is patterned on the apostles in jerusalem in the 1st century then does that mean that paul was not of the fds?.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Yesterday, another poster assured me that this noo lite does not mean that jesus christ is the mediator only for the 8 guys on the GB. However, I'd like to see that in print from WT in the coming months. If they make do that claim eventually, it's time to go on red alert status and start actively waking people up on the inside.
• 
  34

  Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

  by metatron in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  not a joke:.

  http://www.theufochronicles.com/2012/10/ufo-activity-at-nuclear-weapons-sites.html.

  keep in mind that the people with their fingers on the button are among the most heavily vetted folks around.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  DarioKehl

  Yup. It's a fantastic read, Satanus! If you're in to that stuff. Susskind is a plumber by trade, but also a PhD Physicist. He's the only guy on earth who successfully proved Stephen Hawking wrong. His "common man" blue-collar background makes this book an easy and enjoyable read for lay people.