Hello Kent,
Thanks for your researches…
although , I must admit, some…are quite
out of the ordinary ! I'm sure that you'll
receive some funny answers!
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
bizarre laws.
most middle eastern countries recognize the following islamic law: "after having sexual relations with a lamb, it is a mortal sin to eat its flesh.
" (umm ok, i'm sure the lamb appreciates that one).
Hello Kent,
Thanks for your researches…
although , I must admit, some…are quite
out of the ordinary ! I'm sure that you'll
receive some funny answers!
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
i have no quarrel with anyone who wishes to hope for the.
society's 'reform', i just want to draw attention to the .
real cause of change by distinguishing reform from mainstreaming.. when someone says 'reform', i think of brave reformers who.
Hello Metraton ,
a very interesting subject with many ideas.
My personal opinion is similar to the words written by JANG:
"..enough changes to make it a safer place for people emptionally and physically and to give them the freedom to leave and even change to another belief without the ostracising that now takes place.
That is Mainstreaming/Reform"
I do like the way you bring out each point, it leaves the person with the option
to accept the validity or...swallow anything that come from the « mountain ».
I’ll post again more comments. Thanks for the good work.
To Ros : logical comments, part. the quote about the First Amend.
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
we had a lovely meal and conversation, but then the conversation turned to rome, which is a city all of us had visited not too long ago.. we spoke about the sights as you normally do, the vatican, st peters bassilica, the sistene chapel, and so on.
but then i mentioned the catacombs.
i am impressed by the sheer size of the catacombs.
Hello Ozziepost,
Interesting experioence.
Btw did you like Rome? Do you plan to go for an other trip?
After all you could be a guest at the Bethel…!
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
P.S. ..it is only a joke!
raymond franz unwittingly reveals the truth insofar as the comparability of todays jehovahs witnesses and those who were true worshipers in queen esthers day.. raymond franz said:.
raymond franz, a high-ranking jehovah's witness who was disfellowshipped and then wrote two books about the inner workings of the faith, said he doesn't believe cases of pedophilia are any more prevalent in the denomination than in others.
but the religion's insularity leads to problems, he said.
Hello everyone,
Quite strange topic, and I do like Amazing comment:
"Also, the Jews got involved in the politics of Babylon and Syria during captivity and after. Esther even married 'out of the truth to an unbeliever'. Daniel served as a political Administrator 3rd in line from the King in power and authority."
I do think that you cannot compare the two.
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
i was just looking at this quote from another thread:.
"of what significance is this today?
it means that by the fall of 1963 mankind has dwelt upon this earth 5,988 years.
Hello comment,
A very nice topic and question!
You do know the answer to your question and
now you do understand the problem with " older " literature…!
It shakes , and eventually d e s t r o y trust in the WTS.
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
page 7, july 2001 our kingdom ministry (aust.
edition) .
* publications permanently out of stock:.
Hello ApostleAk, Sawthelight and Peterstride
Good question!
I do believe that both answer are applicable.
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
after posting on the maximus nourishment for the spirit thread about elaine pagel's "the origin of satan" and "adam, eve, and the serpent," i check my mail and find the watchtower for august 15, and a qfr (whole page) answering the question, "for how long a period of time did job suffer.".
they say "job's suffering and its resolution may have occurred within a few months, perhaps less than a year.
" blah, blah, tribulation momentary and light, blah, blah, christ will himself finish your training.
Hello everyone,
Interesting discussion…it ended well with Ozziepost …"nail on coffin"
"Job chapter 1 describes the death of Job's sons and daughters. This is followed by these words: "Afterward it came to be the day when the sons of the true God entered to take their station before Jehovah..."-Job 2:1(NWT)
Another translation renders this as: "On another day the angels came to present themselves before the Lord..."(NIV)
Later, the account in Job relates this:
"And they (three companions) kept sitting with him on the earth seven days and seven nights, and there was no one speaking a word to him, for they saw that the pain was very great" - Job 2:13"
Thanks, Ozzie for the points. Thanks also to Hmmm for his comment !
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
does freedom of thought really obtain in this forum?
are those who have left god's organization and jehovah god himself actually now more open-minded and unbiased?
if those who espouse atheistic thoughts or those who believe every vile utterance spoken against jehovah's people think they are now speaking from some olympian perspective, i beg to differ.
Hello everyone,
A very interesting post. Amaong the many replies I do like these ones:
From Farkel: .
"And by implication you have stated that leaving "God's Organization(tm)" is the same a leaving "Jehovah God Himself." Please show evidence for that assertion."
This one rarely receives an answer.
And:
"Read the collective works of the JW Governing Body, Joseph Franklin Rutherford and Charles Taze Russell before you dare go further. "
This one should keep him busy for a while.
From Alan F.:
"You imply that those who have left this non-existant "God's organization" are somehow less open-minded and less biased than JWs are. On what do you base this implication? Real facts?"
Very good questions.
And thanks, again, for the TRUE definition of apostate:
"The elders' manual known as the Flock book states that "persons who deliberately spread (stubbornly hold to and speak about) teachings contrary to Bible truth as taught by Jehovah's Witnesses are apostates." (p. 94) Now think about that for a minute. A Biblical apostate is someone who opposes or has completely abandoned God. Since the Society teaches that it is not inspired, then what it teaches cannot in general be "Bible truth", but only the Society's opinion of Bible truth. But because the Flock book and other JW publications flat-out equate actual Bible truth with the Society's opinion of what is Bible truth, and enforce it via the mechanism of disfellowshipping for "apostasy", the Society is in practice claiming inspiration by enforcing the same punishment upon actual apostates and those who merely disagree with some fallible Watchtower teaching."
I've been stating the same thing, in different words, the same principle…and some friends at the end of the conversation, "had to admit" that it was ...logical and ...yes TRUE!
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
some of you may have already made a post about this but i have decided to post the following anyway.. the booklet - how can blood save your life?
(copyright 2000).
part 2 - bloodvital for life.
Hello Hawkaw, Maximus and Marvin Shilmer,
Many thanks for the excellent topic, the quotes
and the added informations, which I do think show
your keen altruistic interest , in all who come to read at this site.
The research also show a desire to be clear, precise
and not like some…who frequently misquote from other people's work.
I'm sure that many will appreciate your work,
and this will help some to "see better" in these
important aspect of our life.
I'm personally pleased to see that "understanding"
doctors like Sam Muramoto and Dr. Doyle are
supporting AJWRB and as Hawkaw stated :
" …are class doctors who have one thing in mind -
saving lives and treating people with respect".
I have to add that, it has been a great pleasure
to get such informations in this post.
Thanks again, and greetings, J.C.MacHislopp
last year on h20 much was discussed about whether jesus was a historical person.
it was brought out that no mention of jesus is ever made outside the works of christians (presuming that all christian historians are biased) except for the the writings of roman historian, flavius josephus.
and, even the brief mentioin of jesus in josephus works are challenged by some as being spurious addtions to some manuscripts.
Hello Amazing,
Thanks for this interesting post.
I'm also reading with
pleasure, the other informations.
Greetings, J.C.MacHislopp