You are right, Terry.
From the Australian proceedings, it was obvious the WT wanted to confuse and obfuscate the court, to the point of saying a person disfellowships him or herself and shun the congregation.
Angus Stewart, though, did an excellent job of getting out exactly what the doctrine and practice of the JW/WT is in reality.
Words convey ideas clearly if we understand the connotation and exact meaning. Otherwise, the same words can mean different things in different cultural and societal settings.
Associating the WT doctrine and practice of disfellowshipping with relations in a way others can identify with, calling it religious apartheid, brings a deeper emotionally felt understanding to it.
Kudos! I'll definitely start referring to it and describing it that way.