Just a little thought on that subject. Is that like you wouldn't take "Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs" literal? Comparing the Bible to a fairy tale, or myth?
Or would it be like saying It's a book of parables that one should look for the morals behind the story (you would have to go far on some of those sanguinary stories!!)? Such as in Robin Hood and His Merry Men?
Or does the phrase indicate that it's pretty much meaningless--the Bible that is? As it it were written literally, but is not true in many instances, so 'let the reader use discernment'?
If one were speaking of a legal, medical, biography, or any other piece of non-fiction, would that term (not take it literally) ever be used? But, if you were referring to a fictional work, it would be implicit that it was not to be taken literally.
So, what does it mean to say "The Bible can't be taken literally"?
It seems to me to be an astute sidestep of the infallibility of the Bible and would not offend anyone. But I just want to know others'take on it.
Thanks.
Puzzled Pat