This seems to be the quintessence of nit-picking. Norm, your post was perfectly clear to me. But the debates over semantics is exhausting.
The whole Bible is fraught with immoral behavior before, during, and after the law. Albeit the Christian times had less decreed.
There are way too many specifics of genocide, abuse of women, children, and slaves, and unjust behaviour (bring your son to the gates and have him stoned) to bother with, in my opinion.
It seems some are more interested in missing the point and having a good argument.
If 'Christian values' are necessary to a moral society, how have we been existing before? I think the idea is correct now: leave religion out of government!
I know, for one, I have less trouble with values and morals now after leaving. The reason is that it is what I choose to be for my own reasons. Not because someone else decrees it and I have to consult a talmud-like group for my decisions.
Good posts, Norm and Larc.
Pat