i have always found the hubble deep field photograph, apparently hubbles most important photograph, very interesting.. for those of you who don't know, it's a long exposure or series of long exposures taken over many months of an otherwise completely empty and black region of space.. i was reading some info on it from the uk physicist brian cox, and he explains another dimension to it.. when you look at the deep field photograph, you are seeing a true 3d picture.
each galaxy in the picture are vast distances apart.
some relatively near, some almost the entire edge of the galaxy away.
Note this:
In our homes, wherever, we all have flipped through our TV remote control and found channels with white noisy snow, that piercing SNOW is the background radiation left over from the Big Bang 13.8 billion year ago.
This is empirical observational first hand personal proof for the Big Bang cosmos beginning, the most important event in the universe.
Dissonantly sobering!
the wt says yes.
i looked it up a few weeks ago and they said "we can be sure he used his fathers name".
for me the argument is more just interesting from a biblical and academic stand point.
@extractor
Like a dead clock, right twice a day, JWs (like most religions) can have some things correct.
But we know at their core they have an agenda that’s toxic; it is a facade, a religious kabuki real-estate empire with few smattering of truth.
Dangerous!
So what do we do about this? We simply collect and believe all the nuggets of truth, avoid the false religious agenda traps, and serve God faithfully. It does take diligence.
This is how all the faithful "saints" in the past did it. Such faithful are gathered in God spiritual temple and rewarded.
in his upcomming book, "how jesus became god" bart ehrman has a new view on how paul viewed jesus.
since i am a huge bart ehrman fan i am a member of his blog site, http://ehrmanblog.org link to direct blog entry: http://ehrmanblog.org/pauls-view-of-jesus-as-an-angel-for-members/.
there he made a recent blog entry where he argues that paul viewed jesus to be an angel according to galations 4:14. .
Jesus doesn't see it that way. He's content with being the " SON of God." It's always been that way.
Our job is to pay attention to details, like YOU pay attention to legal brief facts of a case.
Remember?
in his upcomming book, "how jesus became god" bart ehrman has a new view on how paul viewed jesus.
since i am a huge bart ehrman fan i am a member of his blog site, http://ehrmanblog.org link to direct blog entry: http://ehrmanblog.org/pauls-view-of-jesus-as-an-angel-for-members/.
there he made a recent blog entry where he argues that paul viewed jesus to be an angel according to galations 4:14. .
Strong's 32 aggelos ang'-el-os from aggello; a messenger; especially an "angel"; by implication, a pastor:--angel, messenger.
NIV Gal 4:14 "and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn. Instead, you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself."
ESV "and though my condition was a trial to you, you did not scorn or despise me, but received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus."
AV Lk 1:38 And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel aggelos departed from her.
did you get baptized without being dedicated?.
why did you allow men to come between you and jehovah?.
why were you serving jehovah at all?
somethings not right.
Of course it's a spoof. Why would a "vow to Jehovah" person want to go round and round with x-Jdubs? Doesn't add up!
did you get baptized without being dedicated?.
why did you allow men to come between you and jehovah?.
why were you serving jehovah at all?
watcher,
Come back anytime. Eventually you will connect the dots, everyone here did in their own time frame.
We enjoy exchanging thoughts.
did you get baptized without being dedicated?.
why did you allow men to come between you and jehovah?.
why were you serving jehovah at all?
cofty,
Amen... where are you, road to Demascus?
ive just published a new article on my website, this time about about the subject of baptism.
its titled the significance and purpose of baptism.
its divided in 5 parts:.
@Eden
THE SIGNIFICANCE AND PURPOSE OF BAPTISM
Enjoyed your article.
The contrast between spirit "born anew" sons of God vs. "born of flesh" sons of Adam is becoming quite clear as "knowledge is multiplied." Dan 12:4, 10
We live in very interesting times!
the wt says yes.
i looked it up a few weeks ago and they said "we can be sure he used his fathers name".
for me the argument is more just interesting from a biblical and academic stand point.
@extractor
You are buying into fourth century theology which is contaminated. This explains it.
they were allways off limits when jw's.. but now, analysing everything, there are more questions.. like what about healers, and alternative therapies etc.. .
Chiropractor saved my friend
Top notch US medical provider, Kaiser, uses chiropractic, acupuncture, and massage treatments . They work fabulously, I feel great!
proven to work through double blind trials
And, "double blind trials" studying the human brain prove "proper methods of prayer" are therapeutic, causing longer life span (corrected).
cofty, I was thinking of you when I read it.
