faithfulslavedriver
JoinedTopics Started by faithfulslavedriver
-
7
List of articles in WT Ray Franz wrote?
by faithfulslavedriver indoes somebody have a list, even an incomplete one, of articles rf wrote?
i know he contributed some to the aid book and occasionally i come across an older article that reminds me of coc or isocf.
what about ed dunlap?
-
4
Does WBTS failure to self-deprecate prove lack of God's spirit?
by Fernando in(luke 17:10) .
.so you, also, when you have done all the things assigned to you, say, we are good-for-nothing slaves.
what we have done is what we ought to have done.. (matthew 20:25-27) .
-
39
Is it too much to ask the "CREATOR" in this technological, scientific age to give us a modern update for his intentions?
by smiddy inis this a fair question to put to jehovah / yahweh or whoever ?
in all sincerity i do not mean any disrespect to any beleivers in the god of the bible, but this is a truly remarkable age with communication advances incomparable with 2000 years ago , if the creator or jesus christ were truly interested in giving everybody the chance of everlasting life , wouldn`t they be giving people the opportunity to hear a more current up to date warning now ?
and not relying on messages in languages that are not in use today and are subject to so many different interpretations ?.
-
8
Future "New Light" on "this Generation" posted here now!!!
by Witness 007 inthe governing body {karl klien} in the 1970's considered changing the generation to refer to those who saw "sputnik.
" this dumbass idea was not approved....however....2012?.
2012 new light = "this generation that knew the 1914 generation is.....the new "generation.
-
70
If the WT dumped 1914 tommorow ...?
by faithfulslavedriver inthis is my first post here.
i've been a lurker for awhile but had no particular desire to join until the other day.. anyways, do you think that if wt decided to face the fact that 607-1914 is an indefensible pile of crap that has been artificially kept steaming for way too long, would it really kick off a mass exodus or anything?
in the short term the fds/gb might lose some authority, but they are hemorrhaging people anyways keeping it around (607 started me on the road to this place).. if wt stopped talking about 1914 for awhile then later killed it, blaming it on "further research" or something, and acknowledged some uncertainty in 607/587, i really doubt that very many of the r&f would think much about it.