Next week, on "Pimp My Ride": We take a humble white van and put a freakin' halo on it - now it sells Bibles and $h!t, for free!!
White vans around here are suspicious. They're usually linked to attempted child abductions and sexual assaults.
the jw-wimp-mobile!
this is how they are doing it in mexico..........atlantis
Next week, on "Pimp My Ride": We take a humble white van and put a freakin' halo on it - now it sells Bibles and $h!t, for free!!
White vans around here are suspicious. They're usually linked to attempted child abductions and sexual assaults.
can we start over with new topics such as practical ones about how to format on jwn and posting problems and solutions.. historical posts such as those on rutherford and russell?.
doctrinal adjustments/changes.
reference sources.
If we did have a specific FAQ section, with forum navigation and post formatting tips, it might be great to have that in a highly visible place, such as just below the username - PM box - logout area at the top of the page. This would make it accessible to visitors as well as signed-in members. A Terms of Service link would be helpful too, similarly placed.
greetings, soup lovers:.
i have a huge kitchen at my disposal (not my own); vegetables, cans of this and that and spices are scattered about, prepared to go into a cauldron of minestrone i started a few days ago.
i'm preparing ahead so as to freeze the leftovers to heat up later at home over my hotplate.. nothing like a 6-burner gas range to simmer over!.
I made an absolutely gorgeous spicy Thai chicken soup last weekend. It was relatively simple to make, and so beautifully fragrant. Even Mr Scully, who is somewhat of a fussy eater, enjoyed it and said I should make it again.
is there anybody harder to deal with than hardcore and old-fashioned persons confirmed in their own ways?.
even though these people know times, customs and laws have passed them by and younger folk don't think and act the old ways --they hold the old views, prejudices and disproved stereotypes as absolutely correct anyway!.
think about how stubborn people can be and how impossible it is to get along with them--especially if you cross them, offend them or incite them unnecessarily!.
I thought a Nazarite had to grow hair and NEVER allow it to be cut. Not sure what you are talking about. (Numbers 6)
There were some Nazirites who were lifelong Nazirites, and they never allowed their hair to be cut or their head to be shaved (like Samson for instance). But they could also take a vow for temporary service (a bargaining chip of sorts), hopeful for a good outcome in war or the birth of a healthy child, after which they could cut their hair. (Kind of like a playoff beard, I guess...)
However, if a Nazirite broke his vow, he would be required to shave his head as a sign of his humiliation, and this was the example used by Reza Aslan regarding Paul - he went to the Gentiles to preach the Jesus story and in the process diluted the pure message by sharing it with unworthy Greeks and Romans, whose aim was to rule over the Jews in Jewish territory.
is there anybody harder to deal with than hardcore and old-fashioned persons confirmed in their own ways?.
even though these people know times, customs and laws have passed them by and younger folk don't think and act the old ways --they hold the old views, prejudices and disproved stereotypes as absolutely correct anyway!.
think about how stubborn people can be and how impossible it is to get along with them--especially if you cross them, offend them or incite them unnecessarily!.
Hi Terry,
I just finished listening to Zealot, by Reza Aslan. He comments on this passage as well.
His take on Paul's ministry was that James, who was Jesus' brother, had a huge problem with Paul for taking Jesus' teachings to the Gentiles. James was the head of the Jesus Movement in Jerusalem, and as the brother of Jesus, was in a far better position than Paul to know what Jesus' thoughts on matters would have been. Bottom line, though, was that Jesus was a Jew, and his message was intended for the 'lost sheep of the house of Israel', not the Gentiles. James considered Paul to be an APOSTATE, and subjected him to the humiliation of shaving his head in a Nazirite ritual in the temple (Acts 21:20-25).
As a matter of fact, he claims that 2 John is also referring to Paul, when describing the antichrist, because Paul was preaching a message that appealed to Hellenistic sensibilities over the Jews, who were the actual intended recipients of Jesus' gospel.
7 many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist.
8 Look out for yourselves, that YOU do not lose the things we have worked to produce, but that YOU may obtain a full reward. 9 Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God. He that does remain in this teaching is the one that has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to YOU and does not bring this teaching, never receive him into YOUR homes or say a greeting to him. 11 For he that says a greeting to him is a sharer in his wicked works. ~ 2 John 7-11
So here, John was actually instructing Christians of Jewish origin to shun Paul and anyone following him, considering Pauline Christians to be "deceivers" and of the "antichrist".
All I could think when I heard this was "WWWWOOOOOOOoooowwww"
i was reading about khs on wikipedia and i noticed a link for the memorial of jesus' death.
why would any christian religion celebrate his death and not his resurrection.
a man dying is fairly common.
With the JWs, it isn't Jesus' Resurrection™ that is important - it's the Sacrificial Death™ that's the ticket, because this is what they believe to be the only acceptable means of atonement for the Perfect Human Life™ that Adam lost when he Sinned™ in the Garden of Eden™.
The Resurrection™ story just kind of reinforces the idea that Jesus was the correct choice of sacrifice.
my mom sent me a email telling me that if i want to put any of that (non jw/non christian) religious stuff on my facebook then i should unfriend her.
i didn't respond directly.
i did take the email, remove id'ing aspects and ask my facebook friends to tell me what they thought of the request.
Tell her that facebook has the option to "hide" posts that she finds offensive, no matter who posts them.
I do it all the time. There's only so much religious claptrap a person can take. I don't have to confront the person, hurt their feelings, offend them or make them feel that they have to censor themselves for my benefit. Everybody wins.
...to my boyfriend, we're going to have one of those weddings ('gay' weddings to the straights).. although my jw family know i'm gay, and not going to meetings, only one of my sisters has sussed the situation.
but i think after 3 years it's about time i told them.
especially if sometime in the future i'll turn up with a (gay) wedding ring.
frogonmytoe,
Congratulations! I hope you and your loved one have many wonderful years together.
turtleturtle,
What consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom is none of your effing business.
So, you find "sodomy" disgusting?
Guess what, I find judgemental bigotry disgusting.
Here's a thought: Maybe you don't find it "romantic" because you're doing it wrong.
http://dangerousminds.net/comments/list_of_reasons_for_admission_to_an_insane_asylum.
masturbation for 30 years?
sorry, i'd lost count.
Salvation Army?? Really??
That second one can't be Canadian. They spelled "neighbors" instead of "neighbours".