So sorry to hear this
Posts by Scully
-
47
We are becoming champions of grief. We lost twin B.
by Darkknight757 inlast week we had a reassurance ultrasound with our ob.
she was just supposed to check heartbeats on the two little ones and they were going strong!
but because she had extra time and she can be quite anal about her work (which is a good thing) she decided to take some measurements.
-
Scully
-
14
If you had to choose
by dothemath inif you had to choose to belong to 1 religion, i was curious as to what any on the forum would pick.. i realize most here are likely atheist (i would have to say i'm agnostic), but if any would like to share their opinion, and maybe why?.
-
Scully
I'm atheist. It chose me, I didn't choose it - it was the result of realizing that almost all religions are for sheep who needed someone or something to follow.
My philosophy is grounded in love, kindness, dignity, respect (for myself and others). Secular humanism seems to fit those criteria rather nicely.
-
13
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver - WT buildings in Brooklyn shown in clip
by Scully insee the video clip, at approx 2:55 in this segment:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rbaqwz1xc.
i don't know what it means that donald trump's son-in-law's father (charles kushner) bought those buildings, but thought it was interesting..
-
Scully
Not knowing, apparently, is not a good enough excuse according to the law, and especially not according to WT.
Surely their massive legal team did their due diligence in researching the source of the money??
-
13
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver - WT buildings in Brooklyn shown in clip
by Scully insee the video clip, at approx 2:55 in this segment:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rbaqwz1xc.
i don't know what it means that donald trump's son-in-law's father (charles kushner) bought those buildings, but thought it was interesting..
-
Scully
Finkelstein:
You're right: in the big scheme of things money and property changing hands is really not a big deal. But, from the perspective of a JW who believes their Organization™ is above all reproach, and would *never* take money from anyone whose values didn't mesh with their published values, it is a pretty interesting scenario.
After all, if you can be DFd and labelled as corrupt beyond redemption for smoking or using the swimming pool at the YMCA or buying a lottery ticket or accepting a bribe or selling cigarettes in your corner store, how can they justify selling their property to someone with such a corrupt history? Could it be that they are party to a money-laundering scheme?
All I'm suggesting is that this transaction could possibly raise some eyebrows and maybe even open some eyes among some JWs and cause them to investigate other scandals within the Organization™, such as the ARC and other sexual abuse scandals, the UN Library Card scandal, the stocks held in trust that brought them dividends from Phillip Morris (tobacco products) and so on.
The WT has a lot of do-as-we-say-not-as-we-do rules, but the one that comes to mind is related to "a little leaven (corruption) ferments the whole loaf (renders the entire [whatever] corrupt)" Gal 5:9. Individual JWs are expected to aspire to the most stringent and rigorous standards in their day-to-day lives, yet the Organization™ itself just does whatever it wants in order to further its own aims. Also recall the story of Jesus throwing the money changers out of the temple, due to their corruption, and defiling their Holy Place with usury.
I think it might be an interesting episode to share with JW family members (with full disclosure that John Oliver has a potty mouth and isn't afraid to use it).
-
13
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver - WT buildings in Brooklyn shown in clip
by Scully insee the video clip, at approx 2:55 in this segment:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6rbaqwz1xc.
i don't know what it means that donald trump's son-in-law's father (charles kushner) bought those buildings, but thought it was interesting..
-
Scully
See the video clip, at approx 2:55 in this segment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6RbAQWZ1Xc
I don't know what it means that Donald Trump's son-in-law's father (Charles Kushner) bought those buildings, but thought it was interesting.
-
19
Jehovah Witnesses Unaware They Are Fulfilling Bible Prophecies
by Wakeupcall2u injehovah witnesses unaware they are fulling bible prophecies.
for many of us witnesses that have left either as stricken lost sheep or unlawfully disfellowshiped please consider that our brothers & sisters in the synagogues of kingdom halls are misled & need our help in trying to pull them out of the fire.
the test now on them is about just how they are treating their unlawfully excluded (disfellowshiped) brothers & sisters, as foretold at isaiah 66. at present they sit in judgement on us the growing great crowd who have come out & they are prepared with hard- heartedness to condemn their brothers & sisters to a final everlasting death, by running away as spiritual cowards refusing us a cup of life giving water (truth) matt 10: to explain the apostasy in their temple the disgusting thing in the holy place.
-
Scully
Simon:Religion is a touchstone for mental illness and illiteracy.
If all caps titles and lack of punctuation doesn't convince anyone, I don't know what will.
OUTLAW:
Be grateful he knows what a period is used for......LOL!!
My Kingdom for some flipping paragraphs!
-
19
Being homosexual in a JW house hold
by Jean ini could not find a topic about this if there is one ooops.
it is hard to speak with my mother or any other witnesses about this, their response is "its ok to be gay just don't ever 'act out.
acting out = being with someone even if its a healthy consensual legal relationship between two adults its still wrong.
-
Scully
Don't allow the JWs to sell you the mind-f*ck of believing that by pursuing your own happiness is somehow a rejection of them. They're the ones who choose intolerance and conditional acceptance over accepting a person for who they are.
I wonder how they'd respond to the thought that some scholars believe Jesus was gay?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/apr/20/was-jesus-gay-probably
There are other scholars who believe that David's relationship with Jonathan was homosexual, even though he married women and had children with them. Maybe he was bisexual, or was gay but needed a 'cover story' in order to protect his kingship. Given that he was God's Chosen One™, you'd think that if God objected to his relationship with Jonathan, he would have picked someone else - the same goes with Jesus.
Just some food for thought. YMMV
-
10
Special Public Talk - 2017
by Nicholaus Kopernicus induring yesterday's public talk, i noted the speaker did not make a full reference to the first outline point following the second reference to romans 12:21 - "but keep conquering the evil with the good".this first outline point as i call it, is as follows: "be willing to forgive others whenever there is a basis for doing so".
interesting conditionality i thought!
it references the aw of june 8th 1995 page 10 paras 6-7. in part it says there... "what though, if others sin against us in a more serious way, deeply injuring us?
-
Scully
"Christians are not required to forgive those who practice malicious, willful sin with no repentence."
Does that include The Seven Loathsome Things in Brooklyn/Warwick (and their predecessors) for bald-faced lying to the millions of JWs around the world for over a century??
-
10
Indoctrination or insistence on being right?
by OutsiderLookingIn innobody likes to be wrong.
so after being taught that they have "the truth" for so long, is it that jws just don't want to admit that they are wrong so they'll keep going in the same direction rather than reversing course?
this is different from indoctrination when you truly believe what you're saying.
-
Scully
I think there are psychological forces involved, beyond the indoctrination.
Like Stockholm Syndrome, for one, where people in abusive relationships make excuses for their abusers, show them loyalty and devotion. The longer a person stays in this type of relationship (especially if the abuse is not physical) the more likely they're in for the long haul.
Sometimes, people just can't tolerate leaving a bad relationship, and make excuses for staying in a bad situation. "It's good enough for me to stay/not bad enough to leave"; "I don't know how to be on my own without ____"; "I've invested too much of my life/money to pull out now"; or the infamous "Jehovah will fix things when it's time".
People involved in the stock market also make these kinds of excuses when their stocks start doing poorly "It'll bounce back"; "I have to stick with it to earn back the money I lost"; "It performed so well before, it will again." The brokers encourage this kind of thinking to keep stockholders from bailing en masse in a state of panic.
Elderly JWs often have no alternate social structure other than the people they've known from the KH and Circuit Assemblies™. They've Loyally™ distanced themselves from family members who aren't JWs or who have left the JWs. There really isn't anywhere else for them to go considering they'd have to start over from scratch. Many are disappointed that they aren't yet in the Paradise™ they were promised, but to cut bait now would mean admitting that their entire lives were wasted on lies. That thought is just too overwhelming for them.
-
11
Another Blood Question
by Cold Steel invillage idiot » by the way, [one's wife] can be disfellowshipped for allowing her child to have a transfusion.. just a side question here, but what if the husband allows a child to receive a transfusion over the objection of the wife?.
let's say the wife joins the jws but the husband doesn't?
then, nine years later the husband allows their child to receive the transfusion.
-
Scully
A 15-year-old, especially one that has been Baptized™ as a JW, would have Watchtower's legal teams argue on his behalf that he is a Mature Minor™ capable of making a so-called "informed" (ie, indoctrinated) choice to refuse a blood transfusion.
The fact that he is not Baptized™ as a JW, Watchtower's lawyers would argue against his choice to have a blood transfusion, saying that he does not have the capacity to make such a decision.
Frankly, if a 13-year-old girl can obtain birth control without parental knowledge or consent and can obtain an abortion (in Canada, at least) without her parents' knowledge or consent, it completely throws the argument out the window that a 15-year-old is not in a position to accept a blood transfusion against his parents' wishes. He's choosing to live. His parents are choosing to gamble with his life.