Found an interesting article about the movie with a viewpoint that closely matches my own. Here's an excerpt:
I'm sure I'm not the only adult in the audience who, while watching the film, flashed back to their first time seeing "Star Wars." Of course, I'm not 12 years old now, and sitting through a three-hour movie was harder, but still, I was swept away by the film and enjoyed every minute of it.The best part is that my vision of Tolkien wasn't compromised at all. What I realized after watching the film was that my version was still safe and sound in the musty reaches of my brain. Jackson's vision didn't change or negate mine -- it wasn't necessarily better than what I'd dreamed up all those years ago, just different.
But what a difference. Up there on the screen was the passion of a man who has devoted several years of his life to telling this story. Accompanying press materials say that the director personally approved every single handmade prop that appears in the film, signed off on every single detailed sketch. And it shows. Though I have quibbles with a few elements of the film, nothing about it is by the numbers or offhand -- every frame shows a unique and personal vision, one that I respect as much as I respect the original Tolkien novels.
The key was not that Jackson was faithful to every detail of the books. True, he was as faithful as he could be, but if he'd filmed every twist of the tale, the film would have been 10 hours long. But the way he shaped and molded the books, to make the adventure flow without sacrificing small, personal moments -- that showed a sure hand and confident creativity. Jackson was faithful to the spirit of the books -- more faithful than I would have thought possible. He made "The Lord of the Rings" into a truly enjoyable movie -- his movie.
Fear-driven Hollywood
And that kind of passion and commitment is what we need more of in movies. The other big literary adaptation of the holiday season is Chris Columbus' "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone," which I enjoyed and which was competent in almost every way. But it took no chances: It showed me nothing new, nothing I hadn't imagined myself. It never made me gasp with wonder or horror. I never felt the filmmaker's passion to get it right -- only his fear of getting it wrong.