When he was here in San Diego for the screening of truth be told, he told us of an interesting case that they are considering. The question came up (as it always does), as to why shunning and the games associated with it are legal. He explained its all first ammendment and the branch uses it as both a sheild and a sword whenever they need to.
However there is a case in antoher state (I'm in Cali) that could breech that a bit. A person in the hall took a young girl and raped her. He recorded the rape because he was especially sick. He got caught and went to jail, but the elders on the judicial comitee sat there with the yound girl and the parents and listened to the tape with them, asking the girl to explain what was happening as they went through it piece by piece with pauses so she could explain what was happening.
Really? Imagine now how those parents must feel shame for not standing up, slapping those guys three stooges style and just walking out of the room.
So they are now suing, basically claiming intentional infliction of distress or something to that effect. I am seriously planning on following that case if and when it goes anywhere.