Posts by Halcon

64

I am not redsetter, here is his message for you

by redsetter2 in

you read this correctly.

as i explained in an earlier post, i am a "ghostwriter" for the original resetter.

i'm a woman, a pimo regular pioneer working for my friend who was redsetter1 on reddit.

Halcon

Vidiot -…that there might be a lot more PIMOs than anybody thought (as strongly suggested by Covid/Zoom)…

…but more importantly…

…the Org leadership and loyalists truly cannot grasp that PIMOs genuinely no longer believe the WTS has “The Truth”

All religions of course require faith from their members. I think it's safe to say that most members do WANT to believe still. But so much hinged on the pre-1995 generation teaching. It was rather 'exciting' to truly believe that you were going to see Armageddon soon.

30 years later, something has to change. And I guess they are. It's ironic that JW members will eventually have to believe what more or less all other religions believe if it's going stick around.

64

I am not redsetter, here is his message for you

by redsetter2 in

you read this correctly.

as i explained in an earlier post, i am a "ghostwriter" for the original resetter.

i'm a woman, a pimo regular pioneer working for my friend who was redsetter1 on reddit.

Halcon

Ty Ron

Very interesting indeed. There are two things about this that stand out to me.

The first is that this truly comes across as very reactive. Even an elder in a congregation that is still 'all in' HAS to be asking himself "well what did you expect with all these changes?"

The other thing is that this type of announcement comes across as showing JW as being very dependent on actual effort by the members. It's contrasting to the idea that God's spirit will take care of things as important as the ministry for example.

I don't think this announcement was a good idea.

64

I am not redsetter, here is his message for you

by redsetter2 in

you read this correctly.

as i explained in an earlier post, i am a "ghostwriter" for the original resetter.

i'm a woman, a pimo regular pioneer working for my friend who was redsetter1 on reddit.

Halcon

Nowwhat- Now they're bitching to the elders in their latest letter that not enough bible studies are being started!

Interesting. Can someone put this letter on here?

17

How Does WT Explain away, "Absent from the Body, Present with the Lord"?

by Sea Breeze in

5now he that wrought us for this very thing is god, who gave unto us the earnest of the spirit.6being therefore always of good courage, and knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the lord 7(for we walk by faith, not by sight); 8we are of good courage, i say, and are willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be at home with the lord.

9wherefore also we make it our aim, whether at home or absent, to be well-pleasing unto him.. since watchtower teaches there is only one "you" and not three (soul, body & spirit); how do jw's deal with the fact that scripture says that it is possible for a person to be absent from their body and to be present with the lord in heaven?when i was pioneering, i don't recall a householder every dropping this verse on me; and i'm not sure how i would have handled it if they did.

what say you?.

Halcon

Seabreeze-Apparently, fairly well. But, the souls want their bodies back so they can be whole again.... as originally designed, but with a major systems upgrade. But, still a physical body.

Phil. 3: 21 - Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body - KJV

This is no different from the JW teaching. JW teaches that people are resurrected, but with "a major systems upgrade. But still a physical body". Aka, a perfect body.

73

Rekindled Light — The Narrative Structure of the Hexaemeron (Genesis 1:1–31)

by Mebaqqer2 in

i used to comment here many years ago when i had an interest in biblical research in relation to jehovah’s witnesses.

these days my biblical research is little concerned with jehovah’s witnesses.

i feel my time is better spent researching the diachronistic development of the biblical text and ascertaining what the biblical writers and editors intended in the times in which they lived.. i have recently placed a summary diagram for a paper that i have written with original research entitled the narrative structure of the hexaemeron on academia.edu.

Halcon

Perfect, adding it to my list.

23

What exactly IS 1914 these days?

by Halcon in

it's no longer a year tying to the present (the old pre-1995 generation belief).

realistically, that's the only reason why it mattered.

and if it doesn't really matter what it is anymore, why would jw not do away with it?.

Halcon

Mikejw-Yes it would mean no more sense of urgency. The end is right around the corner. We are in the final part of the final part shortly before the day and all that.

If they do away with 1914 then how do they keep the sense of urgency

I believe that sense of urgency has been greatly undermined by the new 'box check' rule regarding time reporting. The beard rule and sisters in pants simply reinforced the idea that things are far more relaxed than ever before. Then there's the relaxed rules regarding expelled ones.

Was this intentional on the part of the GB? It's hard to argue it wasn't in my opinion. Like in any organization, you don't get to the top without being shrewd and clever. And if this is the case, they've set up the abandoning of the generation teaching perfectly.

17

How Does WT Explain away, "Absent from the Body, Present with the Lord"?

by Sea Breeze in

5now he that wrought us for this very thing is god, who gave unto us the earnest of the spirit.6being therefore always of good courage, and knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the lord 7(for we walk by faith, not by sight); 8we are of good courage, i say, and are willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be at home with the lord.

9wherefore also we make it our aim, whether at home or absent, to be well-pleasing unto him.. since watchtower teaches there is only one "you" and not three (soul, body & spirit); how do jw's deal with the fact that scripture says that it is possible for a person to be absent from their body and to be present with the lord in heaven?when i was pioneering, i don't recall a householder every dropping this verse on me; and i'm not sure how i would have handled it if they did.

what say you?.

Halcon

Im guessing, but it seems to Witnesses that man has a dual nature, body and soul. Soul then equals personality including memories, intellect, will and emotions

How does this soul, without a body, interact in heaven (in any religious teaching)?

23

What exactly IS 1914 these days?

by Halcon in

it's no longer a year tying to the present (the old pre-1995 generation belief).

realistically, that's the only reason why it mattered.

and if it doesn't really matter what it is anymore, why would jw not do away with it?.

Halcon

VH-Jesus was enthroned in 1914, Christendom was rejected in 1918, the apostles were raised to heavenly life in 1918 and the Faithful Slave (Watchtower directors) was appointed at Brooklyn headquarters in 1919.

If 1914 goes, so does GB authority

Then perhaps the generation theory attached to 1914 could be entirely removed? If so, would that truly be a big deal?

23

What exactly IS 1914 these days?

by Halcon in

it's no longer a year tying to the present (the old pre-1995 generation belief).

realistically, that's the only reason why it mattered.

and if it doesn't really matter what it is anymore, why would jw not do away with it?.

Halcon

It's no longer a year tying to the present (the old pre-1995 generation belief). Realistically, that's the only reason why it mattered.

And if it doesn't really matter what it is anymore, why would JW not do away with it?

17

How Does WT Explain away, "Absent from the Body, Present with the Lord"?

by Sea Breeze in

5now he that wrought us for this very thing is god, who gave unto us the earnest of the spirit.6being therefore always of good courage, and knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the lord 7(for we walk by faith, not by sight); 8we are of good courage, i say, and are willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be at home with the lord.

9wherefore also we make it our aim, whether at home or absent, to be well-pleasing unto him.. since watchtower teaches there is only one "you" and not three (soul, body & spirit); how do jw's deal with the fact that scripture says that it is possible for a person to be absent from their body and to be present with the lord in heaven?when i was pioneering, i don't recall a householder every dropping this verse on me; and i'm not sure how i would have handled it if they did.

what say you?.

Halcon

I believe their explanation is a bit more simple. That Paul is keeping his 'eye on the prize', which is heaven. In other words, he gave little importance to his pains and sufferings as a human being, as they were much less consequential than what awaited him in heaven.

Ironically, in a roundabout way, I believe they may be partially correct in this interpretation because the shift is one from physical to mental, with the importance being placed on the mental. The spirit versus the tent that is the flesh.