money?,,,,,,, no, religion!
all the wars that i have studied have been attributed to religious beliefs who's foundation whereby being unfounded and un-provable.
trust in gawd, allah, jesus, jehovah, mohammed and on and on is what the lost say, or "the lord will provide" for that matter.
Yes...jealousy, or coveting....God forgot to make that one more clear in the ten commandments.
It should have said :"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors wife, oil, sugar cane, land, rich farm land, gold mines, water, or any prosperity that thy neighbor may possess and you dont. Thou shalt not kill thy neighbor, even if thou covets aformentioned items."
the new european constitution: the last battle for britain?
no nation has successfully invaded britain since the norman conquest in 1066. in effect, the european union may be about to do what the spanish armada, napoleon and hitler attempted but failed.
many do not realize that the identity and sovereignty of the grand old british nation may be in serious jeopardy.
Sigh...so many troubles to consider when trying to unite states, good luck EU. Hmmm...United States of Europe, kinda catchy, but oh...the copyright infringements...better stick with European Union.
w90 5/15 page 6.. since megiddo was in the land of god?s ancient people, what happens at armageddon relates to jehovah?s witnesses in this "time of the end.
" (daniel 12:4) har?magedon applies to "the place" to which the earth?s political rulers are gathered in opposition to jehovah and his kingdom by jesus christ.
(revelation 16:14, 16) but that "place" (greek, to pos) denotes a world situation.
Doh...I hope Gog doesn't read watchtowers, now he'll know his plan won't work...of course Wiley Coyote always knew he was bound to go off the cliff...
it took me 20 years to work it out, but i think that i have got the hang of it now.. i'll say what i think the difference is a little later.
meanwhile, i'd be interested in what others think.
englishman.
The difference is that if you feel guilty, it's because you know that if faced with the same situation you would do things exactly the same. If it is constructive remorse, then you believe you have at least learned a lesson not to be repeated.
after observing the two sides arguing about the war with iraq, i have come to see 2 kinds of groups, not just the argument from conservatives and liberals, but from those who think with either from their intellectual or emotional standpoints...... from the emotional standpoints who oppose the war, which i would call the "oprah thinkers", these are the group of people who think with their emotional part of the brain rather than the intellectual part of the brain.
the oprah thinkers likes to cry alot and dab their eyes with a hankerchef.
they get outraged when a human being regardless of their background (good or evil) gets killed for whatever reason it may be.. then there are those who support the war, which i would call the "spock thinkers", who think from the intellectual part of the brain rather than from the emotional part of the brain.
Oh sure Gameleil, go ahead and use your "facts" and "statistics" to confuse the issue. You probably believe everything those "scholars" and "scientists" say as well. You and your false god of "data". I wish "you people" would go away so "us people" can indulge in our stereotypical thinking.
I have always
after observing the two sides arguing about the war with iraq, i have come to see 2 kinds of groups, not just the argument from conservatives and liberals, but from those who think with either from their intellectual or emotional standpoints...... from the emotional standpoints who oppose the war, which i would call the "oprah thinkers", these are the group of people who think with their emotional part of the brain rather than the intellectual part of the brain.
the oprah thinkers likes to cry alot and dab their eyes with a hankerchef.
they get outraged when a human being regardless of their background (good or evil) gets killed for whatever reason it may be.. then there are those who support the war, which i would call the "spock thinkers", who think from the intellectual part of the brain rather than from the emotional part of the brain.
Oh sure Gameleil, go ahead and use your "facts" and "statistics" to confuse the issue. You probably believe everything those "scholars" and "scientists" say as well. You and your false god of "data". I wish "you people" would go away so "us people" can indulge in our stereotypical thinking.
I have always felt that there
after observing the two sides arguing about the war with iraq, i have come to see 2 kinds of groups, not just the argument from conservatives and liberals, but from those who think with either from their intellectual or emotional standpoints...... from the emotional standpoints who oppose the war, which i would call the "oprah thinkers", these are the group of people who think with their emotional part of the brain rather than the intellectual part of the brain.
the oprah thinkers likes to cry alot and dab their eyes with a hankerchef.
they get outraged when a human being regardless of their background (good or evil) gets killed for whatever reason it may be.. then there are those who support the war, which i would call the "spock thinkers", who think from the intellectual part of the brain rather than from the emotional part of the brain.
Oh sure Gameleil, go ahead and use your "facts" and "statistics" to confuse the issue. You probably believe everything those "scholars" and "scientists" say as well. You and your false god of "data". I wish "you people" would go away so "us people" can indulge in our stereotypical thinking.
I
after observing the two sides arguing about the war with iraq, i have come to see 2 kinds of groups, not just the argument from conservatives and liberals, but from those who think with either from their intellectual or emotional standpoints...... from the emotional standpoints who oppose the war, which i would call the "oprah thinkers", these are the group of people who think with their emotional part of the brain rather than the intellectual part of the brain.
the oprah thinkers likes to cry alot and dab their eyes with a hankerchef.
they get outraged when a human being regardless of their background (good or evil) gets killed for whatever reason it may be.. then there are those who support the war, which i would call the "spock thinkers", who think from the intellectual part of the brain rather than from the emotional part of the brain.
Oh sure Gameleil, go ahead and use your "facts" and "statistics" to confuse the issue. You probably believe everything those "scholars" and "scientists" say as well. You and your false god of "data". I wish "you people" would go away so "us people" can indulge in our stereotypical thinking.
I have
would you go and see celine dion give a show in las vegas?
do you like her music?
celine dion poses with artictic director franco dragone at a news conference after the opening of her show, "a new day," at the colosseum at caesars palace on las vegas.
To be coated with honey and tied down on a hill of fire ants while hot pokers are shoved in my eyes would be considered better than watching 5 seconds of a Celine Dion show.
i was lurking on the pure language board and came across a post about 607 verses 586/587.
no one really gave a good defense of it and before it could really get going, they closed the thread.
insight books has a good explanation of pivotal dates.
Running man: That one was my favorite as well. If we believed those "scientists" then we probably would believe that there was no global flood 4000 years ago. And everyone knows (except the scientists) all the dinosaurs died at the flood.
This one was precious too: "so I guess they just make some of it up as they go along, if they dont know for sure! " (referring to a bible scholar web site). Man, does that not sound familiar?
