Paragraph 1........WHAT does the near future hold for Jehovah’s people? We do not have to guess
What did they do in paragraphs 5 and 6
GUESS 1. It indicates that what we read about the king of the north and the king of the south COULD not apply to rulers or kingdoms that held power from sometime in the 2nd century to the second half of the 19th century.
Guess 2 When could God’s people again be identified? Explain
Imposed upon any member attempting this question this week.
Guess 3. God’s people could once again be identified!
What words will one find when making guesses? COULD is one of them. The writer of this article placed it where it is needed the most in the ARTICLE. These paragraphs is the major HINGE of the whole article.
First guess to show ELIMINATION of true Christians from first century and support the claim that no king of North or south and no God's people to attack by both kings. Zenobia removal from the Daniel prophecy is to further support the claim that true Christianity ceased after the deaths of the apostle and cannot be seen to have stretched till the third century.
Second guess well placed to show RUSSELL and his associates marks the REBIRTH of TRUE CHRISTIANITY that was absent from the end of the first century.
But the writer of the ARTICLE forgot that Matthew 13 cited in that account about the weeds and wheats undermine all his MENTAL GYMNASTICS. Jesus never said in his parable that the WHEATS die out completely and no where did the HARVEST started with the collection of WHEATS rather it started with reaping of the WEEDS but 1870 - 1919 no WEEDS were reaped or burnt.
The comic aspect of the whole account under paragraphs 5,6 is considering the religious background of RUSSELL and is ASSOCIATE and having the mindset that all other churches apart from of JWS are WEEDS.
It sure looks like a case of Jesus coming/presence in 1870 to turn WEEDS to WHEATS before 1919. Then after 1919 he pronounced the converted WEEDS as WHEATS. Jesus made a liar.