They don't have a choice IMO. The number of older men who are still willing to carry the water for WTC is diminishing quickly, and there is a gap of elders in the 30-50 year bracket. They are actually targeting teenagers, hoping that they will be incentivized to stick with the org instead of leaving when they hit their 20's.You could be right, but if that is their thinking, it's also doomed to fail. Fast-tracking inexperienced, ill-prepared young men into positions of leadership is a sure-fire way to wreck things, both administratively and in terms of personalities and congregation "harmony".
THEY MUST MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE SHEEP - even if they have to use pre-pubescent boys to do so.
Again, look at examples from the "real" world - when too many young and newly-promoted people rise to the top in the police, military, skilled trades and industry, and so on, the quality of output, workmanship and reputation all suffer. You need a balance of youthful energy and creativity from new members along with maturity of experience and thought from older members to get the best out of a group dynamic (and to be more representative).
Tight pants told us, if you're not a MS in your early 20's who would want to be around you.
Yeah, and whatever happened to him? I wonder if he ever reflects on the old adage: "It's not where you start, it's where you finish".
As BluesBrother hinted at, I would bet a lot of these fast-tracked young men will fall away (their beliefs will be too weak and untested or they will just change their mind and be drawn to other things - and people - outside) or they will burn out due to lacking the maturity to pace themselves and balance their lives. And on the way, they will mess up a lot of other people who actually try to follow their "guidance" as "older men". I think any older people - married couples, parents, etc - will just nod at their immature "instruction", stop listening and go and do what they think is best - which will be exactly the opposite of what the Org wants.