while (!bAdult)
{bAdult = SuckNipples();
}
Hmmm...I'm afraid I'll need to see that code for 'SuckNipples' to make sure it isn't an infinite loop.
After all, we wouldn't want one to have to suck nipples for ones entire life, would we?
hi friends.. any programmers out there?
check this program for bugs!.
watch tower computer program - plan for salvation.
while (!bAdult)
{bAdult = SuckNipples();
}
Hmmm...I'm afraid I'll need to see that code for 'SuckNipples' to make sure it isn't an infinite loop.
After all, we wouldn't want one to have to suck nipples for ones entire life, would we?
as anybody notied the photo on the new worship book cover?.
guess the source?.
us navy, why use us navy photos, dont wt have any non miltary sourced pictures they could have used.
Frog: can't link to pictures on your hard drive.
Email them to me and I'll put them up on my site and link it here.
the original "will religion be banned " thread has moved to page 16 so i thought i would start a new one here.. both xander and jan h. asked for proof that the gospel wruters were martyred.
here is the proof of that plus the proof that other persons identified as disciples were martyred as well:.
stephen - stoned to death.
RWC: Did you not read Jan's last post?
His information mirrors what I've found, although I think I can say with some certainty he knows more of the topic that I.
the original "will religion be banned " thread has moved to page 16 so i thought i would start a new one here.. both xander and jan h. asked for proof that the gospel wruters were martyred.
here is the proof of that plus the proof that other persons identified as disciples were martyred as well:.
stephen - stoned to death.
RWC:
I believe you missed the point of my comment.
I don't deny that later, as the church was beginning to gain momentum, persecution happened and 'christians' were executed. That's all well and good.
The problem is that their is no proof outside of christianity that the GOSPEL WRITERS did, in fact, DIE FOR THEIR WRITINGS.
In any case, 'Foxes Book of Martyrs' is perhaps one of the worst cases to use. It is written from a protestant point of view (already christian), telling tales of how terrible the catholic false religion is oppressing 'true christians'.
It does seem to detail the early apostles, but only so far as they are associated with the 'correct understanding of christ' that the protestant churches have.
And, where, pray tell, does he GET these details of apostolic persecution? Why, from the Catholic church, of course!
IOW, The author has an obvious agenda and is writing a book for those with obvious agendas pulling from sources with an obvious agenda (at least, in the case of the apostles).
dear sirs, .
domain http://www.silentlambs.de please note .
hans georg kolpak is a well known .
Oh, good grief people.
Here is the site:
OH NO! PORN BANNERS EVERYWHER....oh, wait, no there isn't. No reference to a porn site ANYWHERE. No links, NOTHING.
Okay, so at the bottom of the page is a link to "Site donated by:" and it goes here:
OH NO! PORN BANNERS EVE.....oh, wait, no there isn't. Again, no reference to a porn site ANYWHERE. No links, NOTHING.
What's the problem here, people? Someone objects 'on principle' to a person hosting SL and porn sites?
For the love of the gods people, get with the program. It's the friggin 21st century, the two aren't related. If you object on principle and nothing else - YOU NEED TO LOOK AT YOUR PRINCIPLES - THAT's where the only problem is!
as anybody notied the photo on the new worship book cover?.
guess the source?.
us navy, why use us navy photos, dont wt have any non miltary sourced pictures they could have used.
It's only a little hypocritical, and only if you think about it 'too much'.
But, yeah, the society has ALWAYS used photos from the US Navy/Air Force/Army/etc. Too bad they don't index it, but if you paid attention to the back of the mags as they came out (when they attributed photos used in the mag), youd've noticed this MANY times.
And, they'll be the first to call on the police if they've been robbed. And, you'd better believe they'd be happy to see the US Marines if US members were overseas and came under attack.
I believe they explain this away as being wise with their 'unrighteous riches'. You know, the perks they get for being inseperably linked with the world even though they are 'no part of the world'.
Which is why the bulk of JWs don't really have a problem with the 'library card' excuse. It's just the society being wise with their 'unrighteous riches'.
the original "will religion be banned " thread has moved to page 16 so i thought i would start a new one here.. both xander and jan h. asked for proof that the gospel wruters were martyred.
here is the proof of that plus the proof that other persons identified as disciples were martyred as well:.
stephen - stoned to death.
I think you'll recall I asked for SECULAR sources.
You know, people WITHOUT an agenda to lie through their teeth to gain followers?
S
E
C
U
L
A
R
As in, 'NOT related to the church'
dear sirs, .
domain http://www.silentlambs.de please note .
hans georg kolpak is a well known .
Since issues of violence against women and children and porn are closely related at the very least in peoples' minds
1) They AREN'T, in fact, related at all
2) The Silentlambs site is, very clearly, quite opposed to child abuse in no uncertain terms. How could someone, viewing it's contents, ever even wonder about its motives?
Indeed, how could the average web user (who just clicks on a link from Yahoo or somesuch) even find OUT about the 'other sites' he runs? Easy: they can't. The only way is if people like those posting on this thread try and make a scandal out of someone hosting porn sites and a child abuse prevention site (which are two completely unrelated things).
I have to ask what kind of idiocy is going on in this thread? No one is going to know that he hosts porn sites unless they have the technical knowledge and curiosity to find out, and of those who do, most are quite clearly aware of the distinction between porn and child molestation.
You're making a mountain out of a molehill.
i remember hearing stories as a kid that john denver would ask all the witnesses present at his concerts to stand.
and, then after they stood, he would play the national anthem.
any truth to this?
that 50% of his staff were JW's
Oh, see, that was back in they heyday of the org - you know, before the current 'wild beast turning against babylon the great' thing. Back in the days when 50% of EVERY staff were JWs.
You remember then, right?
this media video just released by the watchtower to counter what they are doing in disfellowshipping all the whistleblowers is disgusting.
smarmy robert pevy of the writing staff is a total pinhead, and rodney stark is such a joke he makes disfellowshipping out to me a laughing matter!.
http://www.jw-media.org/vnr/2122827332/311131isdn.htm.
They still do.