God may have inserted the “youngest” planet Neptune on the other side to act as a gravitational corrective to make sure it cannot happen again!’
.
Is this why Pluto was recently disfellowshipped?
ive been reviewing the scientific claims that the society promoted through the golden age magazine (later replaced by the awake).
not since reading the laws of leviticus have i had so many wtfs as found in the list http://hourglass2.com/historical/the-list/list7_01.htm .
each statement comes from an official publication of the wtbts.
God may have inserted the “youngest” planet Neptune on the other side to act as a gravitational corrective to make sure it cannot happen again!’
.
Is this why Pluto was recently disfellowshipped?
ive been reviewing the scientific claims that the society promoted through the golden age magazine (later replaced by the awake).
not since reading the laws of leviticus have i had so many wtfs as found in the list http://hourglass2.com/historical/the-list/list7_01.htm .
each statement comes from an official publication of the wtbts.
“It has never been proven that a single disease is due to germs.” Golden-Age Jan 16 1924 (This was a dozen years after medicine had proven bacteria and viruses caused most diseases)
Scientists were guilty of "running ahead of God's Organization™
.
What you do is strip naked mornings and evenings and then bob up and down for a while.” Golden-Age Feb 1926 pg 310
Actually this is good advice. Adam Carolla called it "Girls On Trampolines"
the number of white men on the governing body has often come up for discussion.
the negro member has been called the 'token black.
' no reflection on his race, but it just seems odd that with the great number of witnesses around the world, in such a variety of countries, that every member, but one, is white.. in your opinion, [with 8 as the target number].
Does a black man who's spontaneously turned white (i.e. Michael Jackson) qualify?
how did noah or (russell crowe) fit all the animals on the ark?
how about throwing on the dinosaurs as well!!!.
watchtower 1973 july 15p.7 question from readers.
The Jehovinator™ loves to create as much suffering as possible.
Why not simply have people go to sleep peacefully and never wake up when you can drown them slowly instead?
Why limit punishment to just the guilty people when you can make everything suffer- adults, infants, plants, animals- the entire ecosystem.
---
Even if the ridiculous story was true, it reveals that god is just a big Richard Cranium, nothing more.
.
are there any more examples like this?
pictures changed because a person was disfellowshipped?.
All such changes that I've known of were for judicial reasons.
You'd think Holy Spirit would've seen that coming ahead of time and told the GB to choose someone else.
while researching something else, i came across these two comments from a wt on how we should view the blood issue, when it comes to our pets.. *** w64 2/15 p. 127 questions from readers ***.
"would it be a violation of the scriptures for a christian to permit a veterinarian to give blood transfusions to a pet?
by all means, to do so would be a violation of the scriptures.".
@ jw07: Maybe pets should be disfellowshipped for having sex outside of marriage too
.
If a dog dry humps your leg is it "brazen conduct"?
If a JC takes action, do they put restrictions on the dog's butt sniffing privileges?
bethel writer see's a fatty bethelite take the last bread roll at lunch...should he vent his feelings thru jehovahs holy watchtower magazine...why not!!.
watchtower 1974p.167 "...by over indulging in food....he fails to show love for jehovah god...is food a big thing in his life?
does he selfishly ignore others needs and take more then his share?
Jesus Christ, what havent they commented on? What hasnt there been a questio from the readers about?
*** Watchtower August 15, 2014, p.31 ***
Questions From Readers
"How far inside my ear am I allowed to go using a Q-Tip?"
"While Q-Tips are not specifically mentioned in the Bible*, we can gain valuable insights on this most important matter from principles found in the Law to Israel. Furthermore, when Jesus was on earth....."
.
* please see WT, June 1, 1965, Questions from Readers, "Q-Tips: are they for Christians?"; WT, January 15, 1951, Questions from Readers: "What is god's view on eyebrow waxing?"; WT May 15, 1972, Questions from Readers, "Is it morally acceptable to eat pizza with a fork?"
.
are there any more examples like this?
pictures changed because a person was disfellowshipped?.
It ended up that god didn't really care for the people first pictured, so he had them replaced by someone he liked better (probably because they got more service hours than the first losers).
while researching something else, i came across these two comments from a wt on how we should view the blood issue, when it comes to our pets.. *** w64 2/15 p. 127 questions from readers ***.
"would it be a violation of the scriptures for a christian to permit a veterinarian to give blood transfusions to a pet?
by all means, to do so would be a violation of the scriptures.".
WT has also taken the same idiotic stance on what kinds of pets a JW owns. If you have piranhas, for example, which feed on live fish, the JW becomes 'bloodguilty' for having piranhas, because they feed them live fish.
If the whole process offends Jehovah™ so much, why did he make it that way?
.
Hey, Splash: this 1964 article shows that WT's blood policies also applies to plants:
"But now, what about fertilizer that has blood in it? One who is going to show respect for God’s law on blood would not use it."
i have noticed that many witnesses are very self centered and selfish people as a result of "leaving everything in god's hands to correct".
what i mean is, because "the kingdom will fix poverty, the homeless, poor, underpriveleged, etc...." it means they can just pass by those in need, or fulfill their natural human desire to help (if they have it) by just giving literature!.
so, just preach to those in need, and then you can feel good and smug about yourself!.
because "the kingdom will fix poverty, the homeless, poor, underpriveleged, etc...." it means they can just pass by those in need, or fulfill their natural human desire to help (if they have it) by just giving literature!
.
So in the parable of the "Good Samaritan", why didn't Jesus describe the Samaritan as just walking past the Jew without helping him and "leave it in god's hands"?
I wonder if the rNWT says that the Samaritan simply handed the Jew a magazine and kept walking?