does anyone have the smoking gun that connects the governing body to hypocrisy with the blood issue??
what i mean is, so far every thing ive found in their writing's they say no blood as far as the major 4 components but then say all other fractions,synthetics are a conscience matter seeming to dismiss themselves from responsibility.. so when you try to explain to a stupid jw the hypocrisy they just say well it up to the conscience of the person taking the blood fractions etc.. need help..
Does anyone have the smoking Gun that connects the governing body to hypocrisy with the blood issue?? What i mean is, so far every thing Ive found in their writing's they say no blood as far as the major 4 components but then say all other fractions,synthetics are a conscience matter seeming to dismiss themselves from responsibility.
So when you try to explain to a stupid JW the hypocrisy they just say well it up to the conscience of the person taking the blood fractions etc.
Need help.
god's real name and identity yhvh.
yhwh - fraudulent identity.. .
can we all sue wt for evidenced fraud and deliberate deception ??
I to realized when i found flaws in our religion and not just mistakes but actual cover-ups and changes made to support their doctrine, that yes why wouldn't Satan use a religion that thinks of itself as so godly and accurate and so correct to fool even more people. Just the arrogance of our religion should be enough to warn people away, since Jesus was not like this.
.
hi has anyone read this book.
what did you think ?.
there's still one in my hall, and the JW's have quoted from it a lot in the past. The author made many claims before Babylon was excavated but since, a lot of what he claimed is untrue.
brother of the hawk, newly enlightened & gojira, recorded an elder's meeting on 5/7/03.
both does a great job of defending me and making the elders look foolish!.
thank you raypublisher/jj and jwstruggle for the awesome job you did on it.. follow up story was not recorded but we will post it here hopefully over the weekend.. enjoy, it's pretty hilarious how they try to control us and come after me on a work of fiction!.
What about the book Song of Solomon, i guess they'll need to rip it out of their bibles.
it is probable that if the domestics include the great crowd (other sheep) and the belief is that no fds can be proven to have existed from the death of the last apostle until the reestablished fds in 1918, that most believers from the death of the last apostle or the "dawn" of the 2nd century as the article puts it, will soon be considered other sheep.
the wheat and the weeds articles makes it a point to use a particular expression.
it uses "overgrown" where the parable uses oversown.
there newest understanding is a joke and its obvious. The parable about the wheat and the weeds is about all Christians (which are the anointed) and Jesus does not harvest them until right before or at Armageddon,scriptures prove this. Also the first fruits are the 144k and all you have to-do is read chapter 14 of revelation and right there as plain as day the first fruits are already in heaven singing a new song before the harvest. Their crap is getting so bad they cant even keep it biblicaly strait any more
i realise now that all true christians that believe in christ and get baptized are anointed with holy spirit, making me one of the anointed.
i also believe the symbolic number of 144k are the first-fruits that will be pick by yehovah but no distinction until then (romans chapter 3).
so since there's a scripture in 1john i think that says the anointed will not need to be taught by others and will have understanding, i'm thinking of telling the elders 'do to the fact that i'm now anointed i no longer need to go to their meetings.
I realise now that all true Christians that believe in Christ and get baptized are anointed with holy spirit, making me one of the Anointed. I also believe the symbolic number of 144k are the first-fruits that will be pick by Yehovah but no distinction until then (Romans chapter 3). So since there's a scripture in 1John i think that says the anointed will not need to be taught by others and will have understanding, I'm thinking of telling the elders 'do to the fact that i'm now Anointed i no longer need to go to their meetings. What do you guys think??? I'm thinking fast fade with out any repercussions.
what a joke, first they believe that the anointed are one and the same as the 144k, which is incorrect (144k are the firstfriuts and anointed are all true christians) and also if you believe their crap then look and Rev chapter 14, thier understanding of the anointed 144k are already in heaven singing a new song before the harvesting by Jesus and the angels. I guess they think thier Jw brothers are really stupid not to catch this. And they probably are.
i was flipping through an old volume of the wt mag from 1952 and a qfr was asked about "this generation" from matthew and the author actually mentioned "overlapping" generations.
i was surprised but it dawned on me that pres knorr toyed with this explaination 60 yrs ago so the new light is really partially "old light" from the 50s.
the sept 1 1952 qfr ask "your publications point out that the battle of armaggeddon will come in this generation and that this generation began ad 1914, scriptually, how long is a generation?
Nice find, its unfortunate that the bible is very specific about what a generation is and the overlapping idea is not from the scriptures. i should of got out in 1995!!!!
i recently started thinking if there could be a way to refute the entire 1914 doctrine without having to go into discussing chronology - like proving if jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce or not; if the "gentile times" have anything to to with the kingdom; if "7 times" are really 2520 years"; if those are solar years or lunar years .... and i came to this conclusion: nothing of that matters!
when will the lord sit at the right hand of jehovah?
therefore, the fulfillment of psalm 110:1, when the lord sits by the right hand of jehovah god took place sometime between 35 ce and 60 ce.. .
you should post this over at paradisecafediscussions.org there's some smart bible students over there that would love to chew on this, good stuff.
i recently started thinking if there could be a way to refute the entire 1914 doctrine without having to go into discussing chronology - like proving if jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce or not; if the "gentile times" have anything to to with the kingdom; if "7 times" are really 2520 years"; if those are solar years or lunar years .... and i came to this conclusion: nothing of that matters!
when will the lord sit at the right hand of jehovah?
therefore, the fulfillment of psalm 110:1, when the lord sits by the right hand of jehovah god took place sometime between 35 ce and 60 ce.. .
I'll have to look into that, i do not think Michael is Jesus, by the way. its funny you asked that because in two different scriptures Jesus says that in Luke 10:18 jesus says he say satan fall, but later in when he is about to be crucified he says the satan will now be cast out, so not sure when statan is actually throw out of heaven but surely not 1914. Back on topic why do you think Jesus gets his thrown later then 33ce?
