144k, your original point is being lost in the shuffle. This thread is reminiscent of the one I started about the CBS/Silentlambs program where I declared that Bill Bowen had uttered what was at best a half truth (that anything an elder says is to be taken as the direct word of God).
Your point seems to be that an expert witness involved in an active trial should not be discussing matters involving that trial. I agree with this point. I'm sure that Bill's mission (or mission in life?) is genuine and heartfelt, and perhaps it is the uphill battle that has him resorting to certain tactics that many do not agree with.
This thread has now branched off into a few different topics, one of which is the way that congregations handle cases of molestation. On this matter, my thoughts are clear. If there is a sin committed, judge the sin according to congregation guidelines. However, if there is a crime committed, even if only in allegation, then the authorities should be involved.
If Martha Stewart were an active JW, would she be disfellowshipped today? After her trial? After being found guilty in a court of law, yet still professing innocence, would she be disfellowshipped anyway? My guess is yes.
One of the biggest problems is that elders are empowered (or think they are empowered) to act as judge and jury on almost any subject.
This is an extremely dangerous position to be in (remember Spider Man? "with great power comes great responsibility"?) and some elders are able to be balanced and know when they are overstepping their bounds, yet others (many others) feed on the ego boost and spiral further and further away from their role as spiritual shepherds.