Love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love.
There's nothing you can do that can't be done.
Nothing you can sing that can't be sung.
Nothing you can say but you can learn how to play the game
It's easy.
There's nothing you can make that can't be made.
No one you can save that can't be saved.
Nothing you can do but you can learn how to be in time
It's easy.
All you need is love, all you need is love,
All you need is love, love, love is all you need.
Love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love, love.
All you need is love, all you need is love,
All you need is love, love, love is all you need.
There's nothing you can know that isn't known.
Nothing you can see that isn't shown.
Nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be.
It's easy.
All you need is love, all you need is love,
All you need is love, love, love is all you need.
All you need is love (all together now)
All you need is love (everybody)
All you need is love, love, love is all you need.
Abaddon
JoinedPosts by Abaddon
-
26
To Farkel:
by sf insimon closed the thread which contained this post for you, from me.
i'm not, at this point expecting any reply.
i did, however, want to make sure you saw it:.
-
-
Abaddon
-
8
Kent's Website
by KSJordan inhe has some really good articles on his website, however, when i try to read one i cannot read all of it as i cannot scroll down on his zoomed pages.
is there a way to correct this?
i have emailed him about this, however, he has not seen fit to correct this.
-
-
Abaddon
KSJordan; what browser are you using?
Click on 'Help' on the toolbar, then 'About', and you'll see the version number...
... if no one else is having the problem it could be a clientside problem (i.e. your PC).
And chill out man, people are trying to help you get information off a website that no-one gets paid for making; you sound more than a little rude, although I'm not sure whether this is because English isn't your first language.
-
24
A "sex" Question (possible fluff)
by moman inhow does your "on screen" sexual-personality line up with your "in person everyday" one?.
for example: some posters are very liberated & graphic on-line when discussing sex, but to their mate or to the average person on the street they may seem like "old-dubs" or just very conservative.. please answer honestly & give me a break, this might be my first "fluffer"
-
-
Abaddon
I am the same IRL.
-
14
What The Heck Is UADNA???
by Dutchie inseveral posters are using this signature.
is this a distinct group or a clique, or what?.
when i do good, i feel good.
-
-
Abaddon
Typical Canadians; "CLANDESTINE UNSEEN", as opposed to the other type of unseen I suppose?
Abaddon
Head of Field Operations
UADEU - Benelux
Unseen Apostate Directorate of the European Union - Benelux Region -
7
Body piercing?
by collegegirl inok.... question - what is wrong with body piercing?
i personally feel it is a method of self expression.
i mean, i would never go and get everthing possible pierced, but i do have 2 holes in each ear, and a newly acquired belly ring.. i got my belly done 3 weeks ago, on spring break.
-
-
Abaddon
Oh, I am sure they could pull out some quote from the Mosaic Law, about tattoos and cutting the body, and use it to ilustrate why body piercing is wrong... despite not one scripture to that end.
Similar to the stance on beards; all the guys in the Bible had beards, but an Elder with a beard? No. Why? Because they have stalled somewhere in the 1950's, where anyone with a beard was a pinko-commie-beatnik-hippie, and still consider beards are bad... despite not one scripture to that end.
Similar to the stance on blood; it says abstain from blood. Today that means less than it used to - now you can accept many components of blood, you used not to be able to accept virtually any, and before that you weren't allowed to have organ transplants, and before that you weren't allowed to have vaccinations... the scripture they have based all this on has not changed at all... but the doctrine is framed by imperfect and often poorly educated men, and their meddling with something that should be a matter of conscience had resulted in death after death after death...
I can understand it being frustrating to you collegegirl, but a navel piercing will be the least of your worries if you get hit by a truck and are allowed to die for want of a blood transfusion, not because it says so in the Bible, but because TODAY'S interpretation is 'no blood' (as with those JW's who died before the transplant ban, if they changed the rules the next day, you'd still be dead).
It kinda puts a belly-button ring into perspective, doesn;t it?
If it's any consolation though, I'm 36, have a navel piercing and a tragus (triangular flap in front of your earhole) piercing, and get grief from my parents about it, despite the fact I haven't been in a Kingdum Hall in almost nine years.
Good luck, and if there's one phrase you remember from the Bible, let it be "Get out of her".
-
9
Blame Norway
by Abaddon inwell, i am stunned.... ... there i was, like any normal sane rational thinking person, thinking that it's all canada's fault, when it turns out that it's norway all along!.
get this, it's obviously part of a judeao-reptiloid-norweigan conspiracy.... a group of norwegians are demanding the return of the orklands and the shetlands.. now, before the more confused amongst us get worried, this has nothing to do with tolkein or children's ponies.. the shetlands and the orknies are two groups of islands to the north of scotland in the north sea.. they used to belong to the norwegians, dating back to a time when, broadly speaking, whatever norwegians wanted belonged to them (with a little help from a longship and a group of guys in pointy hats waving sharp objects).. this was never contested by england, or scotland, or anyone who liked their head remaining on top of their shoulders, until the king of norway couldn't pony up the loot for a dowery - he was marrying his daughter off to someone who knew what the word 'barber' meant, and didn't wear hats with screw-om horns all the time, and didn't have a surname like 'bloodaxe', social climbing as kings do.. instead, he gave the shetlands and the orknies to the king of england, on the understanding that when he paid up, he'd get them back.. well, this never happened.
quite how someone can forget (maybe it's something to do with the pointy hats) one has written an iou in the form of two, quite large, groups of islands (we're not just talking three acres of seagull shit here), i don't know.
-
-
Abaddon
Well avengers, at that point the Swedes weren't making jokes about Norwegians and the Norwegians weren't making jokes about Sewedes, as no one had got around to inventing Norwegians or Swedes, or Americans for that matter (other than the original sort is). Basically if you were being chased by a 6' blonde bereserker with a battleaxe and a 'come hither' look in his eye, you didn't particulary care which part of Scandanavia he came from.
From what I remember they came in waves, but a lot that made it to England were actually Danes, although typically they ALL look the same (those pointy hats), which is typical of there duplicitous plan to take over the world. At least with proper foreigners you can tell where they come from... clogs; Dutch... dumb-ass hats with feathers; Austrians... string of onions; french (baugette under one arm optional)... scooter; Italian... Cowboy Hat; American (USS Nimitz class nuclear aircraft carrier optional.
So I think Vikings is a general term, translaetd in Saxon as 'We're all going to die', although I'm sure there's someone out there who actually knows the answer, I doubt if it's as pleasing as believing benign nonsense. But Eric Liefsson? Dunno where he came from. He didn't discover America though. He just didn't know it was there. Different thing. It was discovered a long time ago by an ancestrally distinct group of Amerindians who are now only found in Tiera del Feugo, if memory serves, although given human nature it's quite possible the original inhabitant before them had to swim south from there, so the Tiera de Feugan's might just be the next tribe to lose.
I only say a brief news item expat, a few weeks ago, and the group were, I think, trying to get the Norwegian government to pay 60,000 silver shillings or whatever. But it's too late see; the Euro's come in hasn't it?
Now, I (with Bowler hat, umbrella optional) am going to eat. Roast Beef of course.
-
9
Blame Norway
by Abaddon inwell, i am stunned.... ... there i was, like any normal sane rational thinking person, thinking that it's all canada's fault, when it turns out that it's norway all along!.
get this, it's obviously part of a judeao-reptiloid-norweigan conspiracy.... a group of norwegians are demanding the return of the orklands and the shetlands.. now, before the more confused amongst us get worried, this has nothing to do with tolkein or children's ponies.. the shetlands and the orknies are two groups of islands to the north of scotland in the north sea.. they used to belong to the norwegians, dating back to a time when, broadly speaking, whatever norwegians wanted belonged to them (with a little help from a longship and a group of guys in pointy hats waving sharp objects).. this was never contested by england, or scotland, or anyone who liked their head remaining on top of their shoulders, until the king of norway couldn't pony up the loot for a dowery - he was marrying his daughter off to someone who knew what the word 'barber' meant, and didn't wear hats with screw-om horns all the time, and didn't have a surname like 'bloodaxe', social climbing as kings do.. instead, he gave the shetlands and the orknies to the king of england, on the understanding that when he paid up, he'd get them back.. well, this never happened.
quite how someone can forget (maybe it's something to do with the pointy hats) one has written an iou in the form of two, quite large, groups of islands (we're not just talking three acres of seagull shit here), i don't know.
-
-
Abaddon
Well, I am stunned...
... there I was, like any normal sane rational thinking person, thinking that it's all Canada's fault, when it turns out that it's Norway all along!
Get this, it's OBVIOUSLY part of a Judeao-Reptiloid-Norweigan conspiracy...
A group of Norwegians are demanding the return of The Orklands and the Shetlands.
Now, before the more confused amongst us get worried, this has nothing to do with Tolkein or children's ponies.
The Shetlands and the Orknies are two groups of islands to the north of Scotland in the North Sea.
They used to belong to the Norwegians, dating back to a time when, broadly speaking, whatever Norwegians wanted belonged to them (with a little help from a longship and a group of guys in pointy hats waving sharp objects).
This was never contested by England, or Scotland, or anyone who liked their head remaining on top of their shoulders, until the King of Norway couldn't pony up the loot for a dowery - he was marrying his daughter off to someone who knew what the word 'barber' meant, and didn't wear hats with screw-om horns all the time, and didn't have a surname like 'Bloodaxe', social climbing as Kings do.
Instead, he gave The Shetlands and The Orknies to the King of England, on the understanding that when he paid up, he'd get them back.
Well, this never happened. Quite how someone can forget (maybe it's something to do with the pointy hats) one has written an IOU in the form of two, quite large, GROUPS of islands (we're not just talking three acres of seagull shit here), I don't know. The IOU included the people on them... and to this day, asking an Ork (or whatever you call them) what Tartan they wear is likely to get them longing for the days when you could remove people's heads for asking damn fool questions, as they are NOT Scottish.
But now they want 'em back... just shows that them brokering the ceasefire in Sri Lanka was a ruse...
Blame Norway!
-
10
WTS says 'true' Christians don't sin!
by ozziepost inthe april 15 issue of the watchtower carries this statement:.
"even though we are imperfect and make mistakes, if we pursue righteousness, he shows his love for us in ways that will result in life and blessings.
" (emphasis added).
-
-
Abaddon
So, we have people who can make mistakes, using material compiled by people making mistakes, based on a book written by people who made mistakes, deciding on that basis whether someone has sinned?
Can anyone else see a problem here?
I think the heart of the problem is the double-speak infecting the WTBTShit Society. They are the god-appointed and directed fetid dolorous salve, recieving new light from YHWH (through a T3 Internet link they have in their boardroom no doubt; Tuesday; Netmeeting with YHWH (and he's pissed)).
Anyone reading or being exposed to Dubbie beliefs on this topic would be given the impression that they are right 'cause god told them so ... except when they are wrong, and then it is human imperfection, and 'the light getting ever brighter'.
So, if they are right, they are right, and you MUSTN'T disagree with them as they're speaking for god... unless they are wrong, but then it's quite understandable they are wrong, as they are mortal men with a heavy burden.
The Elders operate on a similar but less lofty level of god-ordained rightness; they still have a tacit belief their appointment has been approved by... not Brooklyn, not the GB, but by good old YHWH. No doubt Henshel wets himself if a 'bad' elder is nominated.
Thus any level of accountabilit or responsibility is 'poof', GONE. Thus the fudging of the issue of sin.
Boy, I am so glad I don't live like that any more...
-
20
You will ALL burn in hell
by Uboat_Ninja inall you apostates will burn in hell when jehovah returns.
-
-
Abaddon
UBoat; Rim my sweaty bung hole
Rate the thread as a one and let it die, the guy's 'I've been out x years and want to do <insert dumb idea here> to get back at them' on one thread, and telling us we're going to Hell on another.
-
124
Booted! On the ship! Kicked off! Df'd!
by teejay inover at kent's cozy discussion forum, at http://kent.steinhaug.com/forum/showthread.php3?s=576c225fa464b8a850eaf84a8f511cad&threadid=62, redhorsewoman started a thread wherein she wanted comments about an old highschool classmate (also a jw) that she recently met again.. responding to her post, i said.
too late for your situation, but i'd treat her as i've come to treat my jw family: leave religion, the truth, jehovah (and the rest of that jw baggage) out of all conversations... unless they bring it up.
and even then, don't expect much.
-
-
Abaddon
joel; I love you deeply and passionately but in a non-squishey way. That was funny. And people say Americans have no sense of irony...
Maybe there IS an 'Axis of Negative Posting' though... but if we put any names to it, then people would be pissed off at being left out...
ANGERED BY SNUBBING, LIBYA, CHINA SYRIA FORM "AXIS OF JUST AS EVIL"
waiting; the "pretty young woman" was Tishie...Cuba, Sudan, Serbia Form Axis of Somewhat Evil; Other Nations Start Own Clubs
Beijing (Reuter) - Bitter after being snubbed for membership in the "Axis of Evil," Libya, China, and Syria today announced they had formed the "Axis of Just as Evil," which they said would be way eviler than that Iran-Iraq-North Korea axis President Bush warned of his State of the Union address.
Axis of Evil members, however, immediately dismissed the new axis as
having, for starters, a really dumb name."Right. They are Just as Evil...in their dreams!" declared North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. "Everybody knows we're the best evils...best at being evil...we're the best."
Diplomats from Syria denied they were jealous over being excluded,
although they conceded they did ask if they could join the Axis of Evil. "They told us it was full," said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad."An Axis can't have more than three countries," explained Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. "This is not my rule, it's tradition. In World War II you had Germany, Italy, and Japan in the evil Axis. So you can only have three. And a secret handshake. Ours is wicked cool."
THE AXIS PANDEMIC
International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was
swift, as within minutes, France surrendered.Elsewhere, peer-conscious nations rushed to gain triumvirate status in
what became a game of geopolitical chairs. Cuba, Sudan, and Serbia said they had formed the Axis of Somewhat Evil, forcing Somalia to join with Uganda and Myanmar in the Axis of Occasionally Evil, while Bulgaria, Indonesia and Russia established the Axis of Not So Much Evil Really As Just Generally Disagreeable.With the criteria suddenly expanded and all the desirable clubs filling up, Sierra Leone, El Salvador, and Rwanda applied to be called the Axis of Countries That Aren't the Worst But Certainly Won't Be Asked to Host the Olympics; Canada, Mexico, and Australia formed the Axis of Nations That Are Actually Quite Nice But Secretly Have Nasty Thoughts About America, while Spain, Scotland, and New Zealand established the Axis of Countries That Be Allowed to Ask Sheep to Wear Lipstick.
"That's not a threat, really, just something we like to do," said Scottish Executive First Minister Jack McConnell.
While wondering if the other nations of the world weren't perhaps making fun of him, a cautious Bush granted approval for most axes, although he rejected the establishment of the Axis of Countries Whose Names End in "Guay," accusing one of its members of filing a false application. Officials from Paraguay, Uruguay, and Chadguay denied the charges.
Israel, meanwhile, insisted it didn't want to join any Axis, but
privately, world leaders said that's only because no one asked them.Whilst your name recall may be offline, I pretty much agree with your comments.
I think anyone expecting boards to remain static and unchanging is being a tad unrealistic. I think ALL boards have a Golden Age, and I sincerely hope, having been lucky enough to be at Tishie's board in the Golden Age, that this board's Golden Age isn't over.
I also think that it's equally unrealistic to expect 'one size to fit all'. It MIGHT at first; ever seen what happens to a new bar? Generally, the first year or two are brilliant; all sorts of different people having fun together. Then it will develop a ground-in character and ethos, for whatever reasons, and the people who stay will be the people who like it there. That doesn't mean they are bad. It means they like it there. And the people who stop going or only drop by occasionally aren't bad either. They just are doing other things.
It seems ridiculous to have to point out that we DON'T all have to do the same thing, think the same way like the same people or believe the same stuff.
What's certain is that there are a million and one things more interesting to do than watch action-replays of arguements between people. I could not, at this stage, give a flying act of copulation over discussions of who is right and wrong, and I'm sure I'm not alone in feeling this.