yadda yadda - If I understand your reply properly.. You are stating that since certain miracles have not been witnessed for 2,000 years or more, Miracles do not exist?
You say to look with my own eyes and find miracles.. Fair Enough.
Here are a few things that my eyes see..
Child Birth, A Limitless Universe, The earths natural & consistent regeneration of fresh, A human teaching an ape over 1,500 words in sign language, You and Me having this conversation as caring & thinking humans..
Oh yeah and I can't "see them" but I'll add my eyes to this list of Miracles. Can you honestly argue that Life it Self is less Miraculous than Resurrection of Life?
As for Hume he was an advocate of inductive reasoning, he was an empiricist, this ultimately led to absurd arguments like this :
"Though the Being, to whom the miracle is ascribed, be in their case, Almighty, it [i.e., the miracle] does not, upon that account, become a whit more probable; since it is impossible for us to know the attributes or actions of such a Being, otherwise than from the experience of his productions, in the usual course of nature. This still reduces us to repeat observations, and obliges us to compare the instances of the violations of truth in the testimony of men with those of the viola- tion of the laws of nature by miracles, in order to judge which of them is most likely and probable."
Essentially Hume is saying' If our current understanding of the Laws of Nature do not correspond with a proposed Miracle, it is impossible that a Miracle took place.
I will admit that I cannot explain Resurrection and the actual Mechanisms that are employed to bring it about. However I take the side of a man named George Campbell when considering miracles..
Campbell argued that the most important factor in determining the authenticity of testimony of a Miracle is the number of witnesses. Numerous witnesses and no evidence of collusion will supersede all other factors, Large Scale testimony is capable of providing absolute certainty even with the most miraculous event.
A friend of Humme asked him, what he thought of the Scotish Theologian Campbell's Essay which responded to Hume's essay on Miracles.
Hume's Response : "The Scotch Theologue has beaten me"